Social Cognition A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

date?

      <--- Score

      17. How are consistent Social cognition definitions important?

      <--- Score

      18. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      19. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      20. What would be the goal or target for a Social cognition’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      21. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      22. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      23. Are accountability and ownership for Social cognition clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      24. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      25. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      26. Is the scope of Social cognition defined?

      <--- Score

      27. What are the core elements of the Social cognition business case?

      <--- Score

      28. Will a Social cognition production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      29. What are the Social cognition use cases?

      <--- Score

      30. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      31. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      32. What is the scope of the Social cognition effort?

      <--- Score

      33. Is Social cognition linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      34. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      35. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Social cognition results are met?

      <--- Score

      36. What are the Social cognition tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      37. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      38. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      39. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      40. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      41. How do you gather Social cognition requirements?

      <--- Score

      42. Is the Social cognition scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      43. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      44. Have all basic functions of Social cognition been defined?

      <--- Score

      45. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      46. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      47. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      48. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      50. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      51. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      52. How have you defined all Social cognition requirements first?

      <--- Score

      53. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      54. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      55. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      56. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      57. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Social cognition leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      58. What sources do you use to gather information for a Social cognition study?

      <--- Score

      59. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      60. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      61. What is the scope of Social cognition?

      <--- Score

      62. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      63. Is the Social cognition scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you think the partners involved in Social cognition would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      65. How does the Social cognition manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      66. What happens if Social cognition’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      67. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      68. How would you define Social cognition leadership?

      <--- Score

      69. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      70. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      71. Is Social cognition currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      72. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      73. Who are the Social cognition improvement