Materials Processing A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      <--- Score

      13. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      14. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      15. Has a Materials Processing requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      16. What would be the goal or target for a Materials Processing’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      17. Is Materials Processing required?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Materials Processing?

      <--- Score

      19. Are accountability and ownership for Materials Processing clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      20. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      21. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      22. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      23. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the record-keeping requirements of Materials Processing activities?

      <--- Score

      25. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      26. Are the Materials Processing requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      27. How do you hand over Materials Processing context?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there a critical path to deliver Materials Processing results?

      <--- Score

      29. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      30. How did the Materials Processing manager receive input to the development of a Materials Processing improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      31. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      32. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      33. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      34. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Materials Processing leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      35. Will a Materials Processing production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      36. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      37. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      38. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      39. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      40. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      41. How would you define Materials Processing leadership?

      <--- Score

      42. Do you all define Materials Processing in the same way?

      <--- Score

      43. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      44. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      45. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Materials Processing work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      46. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      47. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      48. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      49. What happens if Materials Processing’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      50. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      51. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      52. Is Materials Processing currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      53. Who approved the Materials Processing scope?

      <--- Score

      54. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      56. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Materials Processing? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      57. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      58. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      59. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      60. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      61. How do you think the partners involved in Materials Processing would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      62. How do you manage changes in Materials Processing requirements?

      <--- Score

      63. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      64. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      65. How do you manage unclear Materials Processing requirements?

      <--- Score

      66. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      67. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      68. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      69. How do you gather Materials Processing requirements?

      <--- Score

      70. How will variation in the actual durations of each