Team Composition A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

what you do?

      <--- Score

      13. What is the definition of Team composition excellence?

      <--- Score

      14. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      15. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      16. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      17. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      18. What Team composition requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      19. How do you gather Team composition requirements?

      <--- Score

      20. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      21. Is there a Team composition management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      22. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      23. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      24. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      25. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      26. Has a Team composition requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      27. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      28. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      29. Will team members regularly document their Team composition work?

      <--- Score

      30. Do you have a Team composition success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      31. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      32. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      33. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      34. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      35. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      36. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      37. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      38. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      39. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      40. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Team composition brings?

      <--- Score

      41. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      42. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the scope of Team composition?

      <--- Score

      44. What Team composition services do you require?

      <--- Score

      45. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      46. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      47. What happens if Team composition’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      48. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      49. What is the scope of the Team composition effort?

      <--- Score

      50. How did the Team composition manager receive input to the development of a Team composition improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      51. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      52. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      53. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      54. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      56. Have all basic functions of Team composition been defined?

      <--- Score

      57. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      58. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      59. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      60. Is there a clear Team composition case definition?

      <--- Score

      61. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      62. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      63. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      64. Is Team composition currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      65. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      66. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      68.