Project 6 A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      20. Is the Project 6 scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      21. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      22. How can the value of Project 6 be defined?

      <--- Score

      23. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      24. Who are the Project 6 improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      25. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      26. What is the definition of Project 6 excellence?

      <--- Score

      27. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Project 6 work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      28. How do you catch Project 6 definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      29. Are the Project 6 requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      30. What are the Project 6 tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      31. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      32. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      33. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      34. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      35. How have you defined all Project 6 requirements first?

      <--- Score

      36. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      37. How does the Project 6 manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      38. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      39. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      40. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      41. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      42. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Project 6 results are met?

      <--- Score

      43. Has the Project 6 work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      44. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      45. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      46. Is special Project 6 user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      47. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      48. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Project 6 changes?

      <--- Score

      49. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      50. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      51. How are consistent Project 6 definitions important?

      <--- Score

      52. What is the scope of the Project 6 work?

      <--- Score

      53. How would you define Project 6 leadership?

      <--- Score

      54. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      56. Is there any additional Project 6 definition of success?

      <--- Score

      57. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      58. Has a Project 6 requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      59. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      60. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      61. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      63. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      64. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Project 6 leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      65. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      66. Is Project 6 required?

      <--- Score

      67. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      68. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      69. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      70. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      71. What would be the goal or target for a Project 6’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      72. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      73. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      74. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      75. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <---