Intelligence Cycle Management A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

How would you define Intelligence cycle management leadership?

      <--- Score

      63. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      64. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      65. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      66. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      67. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      68. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      69. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      70. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      71. Is Intelligence cycle management currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      72. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      73. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Intelligence cycle management leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      75. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      76. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      77. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      78. What are the Intelligence cycle management use cases?

      <--- Score

      79. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you gather Intelligence cycle management requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Intelligence cycle management changes?

      <--- Score

      82. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      83. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      84. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      85. How are consistent Intelligence cycle management definitions important?

      <--- Score

      86. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      87. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      88. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      89. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      90. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      91. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      92. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      93. Will team members regularly document their Intelligence cycle management work?

      <--- Score

      94. What is the scope of the Intelligence cycle management work?

      <--- Score

      95. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      96. Is there a clear Intelligence cycle management case definition?

      <--- Score

      97. How will the Intelligence cycle management team and the group measure complete success of Intelligence cycle management?

      <--- Score

      98. How does the Intelligence cycle management manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      99. Are the Intelligence cycle management requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      100. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Intelligence cycle management?

      <--- Score

      101. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      102. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      103. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Intelligence cycle management? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      104. Is Intelligence cycle management required?

      <--- Score

      105. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      106. What would be the goal or target for a Intelligence cycle management’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      107. Is the Intelligence cycle management scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      108. What Intelligence cycle management services do you require?

      <--- Score

      109. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Intelligence cycle management work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      110. Who are the Intelligence cycle management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      111. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      112. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      113. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      114. What happens if Intelligence cycle management’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      115. Are accountability and ownership for Intelligence cycle management clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      116. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      117.