Working Assets A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      75. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      76. Is the Working Assets scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      77. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      78. Is the Working Assets scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      79. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Working Assets changes?

      <--- Score

      80. Is the scope of Working Assets defined?

      <--- Score

      81. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      82. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      83. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      84. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      85. What Working Assets services do you require?

      <--- Score

      86. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      87. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      88. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      89. Who are the Working Assets improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      90. Is there a critical path to deliver Working Assets results?

      <--- Score

      91. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      92. Has the Working Assets work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Working Assets work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      94. What would be the goal or target for a Working Assets’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      96. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      97. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      98. Will a Working Assets production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      99. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      100. How did the Working Assets manager receive input to the development of a Working Assets improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      101. Who approved the Working Assets scope?

      <--- Score

      102. How do you manage changes in Working Assets requirements?

      <--- Score

      103. How do you manage unclear Working Assets requirements?

      <--- Score

      104. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the Working Assets use cases?

      <--- Score

      106. What are the record-keeping requirements of Working Assets activities?

      <--- Score

      107. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      108. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      109. What are the core elements of the Working Assets business case?

      <--- Score

      110. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Working Assets study?

      <--- Score

      112. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      113. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      114. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      115. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      116. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      117. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      118. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      119. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      120. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      121. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      122. Is there a Working Assets management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      123. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      124. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      125. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      126. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      127. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      128. Do you have a Working Assets success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      129.