Working Assets A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Читать онлайн.
Название Working Assets A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Серия
Издательство Зарубежная деловая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867456797



Скачать книгу

Score

      62. What is the Working Assets problem definition? What do you need to resolve?

      <--- Score

      63. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?

      <--- Score

      64. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?

      <--- Score

      65. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Working Assets will circumvent those obstacles?

      <--- Score

      66. What would happen if Working Assets weren’t done?

      <--- Score

      67. How are you going to measure success?

      <--- Score

      68. Consider your own Working Assets project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

      <--- Score

      69. Can management personnel recognize the monetary benefit of Working Assets?

      <--- Score

      70. What does Working Assets success mean to the stakeholders?

      <--- Score

      71. Does Working Assets create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

      <--- Score

      72. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?

      <--- Score

      73. What is the recognized need?

      <--- Score

      74. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

      <--- Score

      75. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?

      <--- Score

      76. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Working Assets team, Working Assets itself?

      <--- Score

      77. Who needs to know about Working Assets?

      <--- Score

      78. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?

      <--- Score

      79. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

      <--- Score

      80. Which issues are too important to ignore?

      <--- Score

      81. Will it solve real problems?

      <--- Score

      82. What else needs to be measured?

      <--- Score

      83. How do you recognize an Working Assets objection?

      <--- Score

      84. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?

      <--- Score

      85. For your Working Assets project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?

      <--- Score

      86. Is it needed?

      <--- Score

      87. What Working Assets events should you attend?

      <--- Score

      88. Are there any revenue recognition issues?

      <--- Score

      89. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

      <--- Score

      90. Is the quality assurance team identified?

      <--- Score

      91. Did you miss any major Working Assets issues?

      <--- Score

      92. What information do users need?

      <--- Score

      93. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      94. What do you need to start doing?

      <--- Score

      95. Are there regulatory / compliance issues?

      <--- Score

      96. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Working Assets research related to market response and models?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Working Assets Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      2. How have you defined all Working Assets requirements first?

      <--- Score

      3. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      4. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      5. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      6. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Working Assets results are met?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you catch Working Assets definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      8. Have all basic functions of Working Assets been defined?

      <--- Score

      9. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      10. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      11. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      12. What Working Assets requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      13. What is the definition of Working Assets excellence?

      <--- Score

      14. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Working Assets leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      15. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score