Working Assets A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Why are you doing Working Assets and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      17. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      18. What is the scope of Working Assets?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Working Assets?

      <--- Score

      20. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      21. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      22. What are (control) requirements for Working Assets Information?

      <--- Score

      23. What happens if Working Assets’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      24. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      25. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Working Assets goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      26. What system do you use for gathering Working Assets information?

      <--- Score

      27. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      28. Are accountability and ownership for Working Assets clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      29. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      30. What is the scope of the Working Assets work?

      <--- Score

      31. Is there any additional Working Assets definition of success?

      <--- Score

      32. Is special Working Assets user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      33. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      34. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      35. How would you define Working Assets leadership?

      <--- Score

      36. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      37. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      38. How does the Working Assets manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      39. How do you think the partners involved in Working Assets would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      40. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      41. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      42. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      43. Has a Working Assets requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      44. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      45. Is Working Assets linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      46. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      47. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      48. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      49. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      50. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      51. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      52. How do you gather Working Assets requirements?

      <--- Score

      53. Are the Working Assets requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      54. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      55. How can the value of Working Assets be defined?

      <--- Score

      56. Is Working Assets currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      57. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      58. When is/was the Working Assets start date?

      <--- Score

      59. How are consistent Working Assets definitions important?

      <--- Score

      60. Are the Working Assets requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      61. How will the Working Assets team and the group measure complete success of Working Assets?

      <--- Score

      62. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      63. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      64. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      65. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      66. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      67. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      68. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      69. How do you hand over Working Assets context?

      <--- Score

      70. Is there a clear Working Assets case definition?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the Working Assets tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      72. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Working Assets brings?

      <--- Score

      73. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Working Assets? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      74. What is out of scope?

      <---