William Shakespeare: A Critical Study. Georg Brandes

Clifford's death and Rutland's). Shakespeare, who never bedizens his work with un-English phrases, would certainly not place them in the mouths of dying men, and least of all foist them upon an earlier purely English text.

      Other additions also seem only to have restored the older form of the plays—those, to wit, which really add nothing new, but only elaborate, sometimes more copiously than is necessary or tasteful, a thought already clearly indicated. The original omission in such instances appears almost certainly to have been dictated by considerations of convenience in acting. One example is Queen Margaret's long speech in Part II., Act iii. 2, which is new with the exception of the first fourteen lines.

      But there is another class of additions and alterations which surprises us by being unmistakably in Marlowe's style. If these additions are really by Shakespeare, he must have been under the influence of Marlowe to a quite extraordinary degree. Swinburne has pointed out how entirely the verses which open the fourth act of the Second Part are Marlowesque in rhythm, imagination, and choice of words; but characteristic as are these lines—

      "And now loud howling wolves arouse the jades

       That drag the tragic melancholy night,"

      they are by no means the only additions which seem to point to Marlowe. We feel his presence particularly in the additions to Iden's speeches at the end of the fourth act, in such lines as—

      "Set limb to limb, and thou art far the lesser;

       Thy hand is but a finger to my fist;

       Thy leg a stick, compared with this truncheon;"

      and especially in the concluding speech:—

      "Die, damned wretch, the curse of her that bare thee!

       And as I thrust thy body in with my sword,

       So wish I, I might thrust thy soul to hell.

       Hence will I drag thee headlong by the heels

       Unto a dunghill, which shall be thy grave,

       And there cut off thy most ungracious head."

      There is Marlowesque emphasis in this wildness and ferocity, which reappears, in conjunction with Marlowesque learning, in Young Clifford's lines in the last act:—

      "Meet I an infant of the house of York,.

       Into as many gobbets will I cut it,

       As wild Medea young Absyrtus did:

       In cruelty will I seek out my fame"—

      and in those which, in Part III., Act iv. 2, are placed in the mouth of Warwick:—

      "Our scouts have found the adventure very easy:

       That as Ulysses, and stout Diomede,

       With sleight and manhood stole to Rhesus' tents,

       And brought from thence the Thracian fatal steeds;

       So we, well cover'd with the night's black mantle,

       At unawares may beat down Edward's guard,

       And seize himself."

      And as in the additions there are passages the whole style of which belongs to Marlowe, or bears the strongest traces of his influence, so also there are passages in the earlier text which in every respect recall the manner of Shakespeare. For example, in Part II., Act iii. 2, Warwick's speech:—

      "Who finds the heifer dead, and bleeding fresh,

       And sees fast by a butcher with an axe,

       But will suspect 'twas he that made the slaughter?"

      or Suffolk's to Margaret:—

      "If I depart from thee, I cannot live;

       And in thy sight to die, what were it else,

       But like a pleasant slumber in thy lap?

       Here could I breathe my soul into the air,

       As mild and gentle as the cradle-babe,

       Dying with mother's dug between its lips."

      Most Shakespearian, too, is the manner in which, in Part III., Act ii. I, York's two sons are made to draw their characters, each in a single line, when they receive the tidings of their father's death:—

      "Edward. O, speak no more! for I have heard too much. Richard. Say, how he died, for I will hear it all."

      Again, we seem to hear the voice of Shakespeare when Margaret, after they have murdered her son before her eyes, bursts forth (Part III., Act v. 5):—

      "You have no children, butchers! if you had

       The thought of them would have stirred up remorse."

      This passage anticipates, as it were, a celebrated speech in Macbeth. Most remarkable of all, however, are the Cade scenes in the Second Part. I cannot persuade myself that these were not from the very first the work of Shakespeare. It is evident that they cannot proceed from the pen of Marlowe. An attempt has been made to attribute them to Greene, on the ground that there are other folk-scenes in his works which display a similar strain of humour. But the difference is enormous. It is true that the text here follows the chronicle with extraordinary fidelity; but it was precisely in this ingenious adaptation of material that Shakespeare always showed his strength. And these scenes answer so completely to all the other folk-scenes in Shakespeare, and are so obviously the outcome of the habit of political thought which runs through his whole life, becoming ever more and more pronounced, that we cannot possibly accept them as showing only the trivial alterations and retouches which elsewhere distinguish his text from the older version.

      These admissions made, however, there is on the whole no difficulty in distinguishing the work of other hands in the old texts. We can enjoy, point by point, not only Shakespeare's superiority, but his peculiar style, as we here find it in the very process of development; and we can study his whole method of work in the text which he ultimately produces.

      We have here an almost unique opportunity of observing him in the character of a critical artist. We see what improvements he makes by a trivial retouch, or a mere rearrangement of words. Thus, when Gloucester says of his wife (Part. II., Act ii. 4)—

      "Uneath may she endure the flinty streets,

       To tread them with her tender-feeling feet,"

      all his sympathy speaks in these words. In the old text it is she who says this of herself. In York's great soliloquy in the first act, beginning "Anjou and Maine are given to the French," the first twenty-four lines are Shakespeare's; the rest belong to the old text. From the second "Anjou and Maine" onwards, the verse is conventional and monotonous; the meaning ends with the end of each line, and a pause, as it were, ensues; whereas the verse of the opening passage is full of dramatic movement, life, and fire.

      Again, if we turn to York's soliloquy in the third act (sc. I)—

      "Now, York, or never, steel thy fearful thoughts,"

      and compare it in the two texts, we find their metrical differences so marked that, as Miss Lee has happily put it, the critic can no more doubt that the first version belongs to an earlier stage in the development of dramatic poetry, than the geologist can doubt that a stratum which contains simpler organisms indicates an earlier stage of the earth's development than one containing higher forms of organic life. There are portions of the Second Part which no one can believe that Shakespeare wrote, such as the old-fashioned fooling with Simpcox, which is quite in the manner of Greene. There are others which, without being unworthy of Shakespeare, not only indicate Marlowe in their general style, but are now and then mere variations of verses known to be his. Such, for example, is Margaret's line in Part III., Act i.:—

      "Stern Faulconbridge commands the narrow seas,"

      which clearly echoes the line in Marlowe's Edward II.:—

      "The haughty Dane commands the narrow street."

      What interests us most, perhaps, is the relation between Shakespeare and