Manual de goniometría. Cynthia C. Norkin

anterior del húmero. Pregunta al individuo si ha sentido alguna molestia durante el movimiento. (Remitimos a la figura 5.13 del capítulo 5).

      4. Haz una estimación visual del comienzo y final del ROM.

      5. Devuelve el antebrazo a la posición inicial.

      6. Palpa los puntos anatómicos óseos (acromion, epicóndilo lateral del húmero, cabeza del radio y apófisis estiloides del radio) y márcalos con un lápiz dermográfico. (Remitimos a las figuras 5.9 a 5.12 del capítulo 5).

      7. Alinea las ramas y el fulcro del goniómetro. Alinea la rama proximal con la línea media lateral del húmero usando el acromion y el epicóndilo lateral como referencia. Alinea la rama distal con la línea media lateral del radio, usando la cabeza y la apófisis estiloides del radio como referencia. El fulcro debe estar cerca del epicóndilo lateral del húmero.

      8. Haz una lectura del goniómetro y registra los datos de la posición inicial. (Remitimos a la figura 5.14 del capítulo 5). Retira el goniómetro.

      9. Estabiliza el segmento articular proximal (húmero).

      10. Practica el ROM pasivo, asegurándote de completar toda la movilidad disponible.

      11. Al alcanzar el final del ROM, vuelve a poner y realinea el goniómetro. Si es necesario, palpa de nuevo los puntos anatómicos de referencia. (Remitimos a la figura 5.15).

      12. Haz una lectura del goniómetro y registra los datos de la lectura. Compara la lectura con tu estimación visual para asegurarte de que estás mirando la escala correcta del goniómetro.

      BIBLIOGRAFÍA

      1. Sabari, JS, et al: Goniometric assessment of shoulder range of motion: Comparison of testing in supine and sitting positions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:64, 1998.

      2. Marshall, MM, Morzall, JR y Shealy, JE: The effects of complex wrist and forearm posture on wrist range of motion. Hum Factors 41:205, 1999.

      3. Werner, SL y Plancher, KD: Biomechanics of wrist injuries in sports. Clin Sports Med 17:407, 1998.

      4. Simoneau, GG, et al: Influence of hip position and gender on active hip internal and external rotation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:158, 1998.

      5. Kebaetze, M, McClure, D y Pratt, NA: Thoracic position effect on shoulder range of motion, strength, and three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80(8):945, 1999.

      6. Van Dillen, LR, et al: Effect of knee and hip position on hip extension range of motion in individuals with and without low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 30:307, 2000.

      7. Gates, JJ, Gupta, A y McGarry, MH: The effect of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit due to posterior capsular contracture on passive glenohumeral joint motion. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2794, 2012.

      8. Carey, MA, et al: Reliability, validity and clinical usability of a digital goniometer. Work 36(1):55, 2010.

      9. Lafayette Instrument Evaluation. 2016. [www.lafayetteevaluation.com].

      10. Halo Medical Devices. 2016. [www.halomedicaldevices.com].

      11. PT in Motion Magazine. Online Buyer’s Guide. 5(7):58, 2013.

      12. Kolber, MJ, et al: The reliability and concurrent validity of scapular plane shoulder elevation measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer. Physiother Theory Pract 28(2):161, 2012.

      13. Kolber, MJ y Hanley, WJ: The reliability and concurrent validity of measurements to quantify lumbar spine mobility: An analysis of an iPhone application and gravity based inclinometry. Int J Sports Phys Ther 7(3), 2012.

      14. Blonna, D, et al: Validation of a photography-based goniometry method for measuring range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:29, 2012.

      15. Bennett, D, et al: Measurement of knee joint motion using digital imaging. Int Orthop 33(6):1627, 2009.

      16. Dunleavy, C, Cooney, M y Gormley, J: Procedural considerations for photographic-based joint angle measurements. Physiother Res Int 10(4): 190, 2005.

      17. O’Neill, BJ, et al: Digital photography for assessment of shoulder range of motion: A novel clinical and research tool. Int J Shoulder Surg 7(1): 23, 2013.

      18. Naylor, JM, et al: Validity and reliability of using photography for measuring knee range of motion: A methodological study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:77, 2012.

      19. Tucker, WS y Ingram, RL: Reliability and validity of measuring scapular elevation using an electrical inclinometer. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 22(3):419, 2012.

      20. Penning, LI, et al: Reproducibility of a 3-dimensional gyroscope in measuring shoulder anteflexion and abduction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:135, 2012.

      21. Anderson, DS, et al: Reliability and validity of an iPhone inclinometer as compared to a universal goniometer as a tool for measuring joint motion of the shoulder in apparently healthy subjects. Orthop Pract 25(1):34-38, 2012.

      22. Shin, SA, et al: Within-day reliability of range of motion measurement with a smart phone. Man Ther 17(4):298, 2012.

      23. Moore, ML: The measurement of joint motion. Part II: The technic of goniometry. Phys Ther Rev 29:256, 1949.

      24. Moore, ML: Clinical Assessment of Joint Motion. En: Basmajian, JV (ed): Therapeutic Exercise, 4.^a ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1984.

      25. Rondinelli, RD (ed): Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6.^a ed. American Medical Association, Chicago, 2009.

      26. Cocchiarella, L y Anderson, GBJ (eds): Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5.^a ed. American Medical Association, Chicago, 2001.

      27. Fox, RF y Van Breemen, J: Chronic Rheumatism, Causation and Treatment. Churchill, London, 1934, p 327.

      28. Schenkar, WW: Goniometry: An improved method of joint motion measurement. N Y State J Med 56:539, 1956.

      29. Clarkson, HM: Musculoskeletal Assessment: Joint Motion and Muscle Testing, 3.^a ed. Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Filadelfia, 2013.

      30. Performance Attainment Associates. Product descriptions. 2016. Procedente de [www.spineproducts.com].

      31. Petherick, M, et al: Concurrent validity and intertester reliability of universal and fluid-based goniometers for active elbow range of motion. Phys Ther 68:966, 1988.

      32. Rheault, W, et al: Intertester reliability and concurrent validity of fluid-based and universal goniometers for active knee flexion. Phys Ther 68:1676, 1988.

      33. Goodwin, J, et al: Clinical methods of goniometry: A comparative study. Disabil Rehabil 14:10, 1992.

      34. Rome, K y Cowieson, F: A reliability study of the universal goniometer, fluid goniometer, and electrogoniometer for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion. Foot Ankle Int 17:28, 1996.

      35. Karpovich, PV y Karpovich, GP: Electrogoniometer: A new device for study of joints in action. Fed Proc 18:79, 1959.

      36. Kettelkamp, DB, et al: An electrogoniometric study of knee motion in normal gait. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:775, 1970.

      37. Knutzen, KM, Bates, BT y Hamill, J: Electrogoniometry of postsurgical knee bracing in running. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 62:172, 1983.

      38. Carey, JR, Patterson, JR y Hollenstein, PJ: Sensitivity and reliability of force tracking and