High Finance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      132. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      133. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      134. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      135. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the High Finance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Are High Finance vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

      <--- Score

      2. Has a cost center been established?

      <--- Score

      3. How do you verify and validate the High Finance data?

      <--- Score

      4. What does a Test Case verify?

      <--- Score

      5. How frequently do you verify your High Finance strategy?

      <--- Score

      6. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

      <--- Score

      7. What are the High Finance key cost drivers?

      <--- Score

      8. What tests verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      9. How do you verify performance?

      <--- Score

      10. What potential environmental factors impact the High Finance effort?

      <--- Score

      11. How can you reduce costs?

      <--- Score

      12. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

      <--- Score

      13. How will your organization measure success?

      <--- Score

      14. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

      <--- Score

      15. What is your decision requirements diagram?

      <--- Score

      16. What could cause you to change course?

      <--- Score

      17. Are you able to realize any cost savings?

      <--- Score

      18. What are allowable costs?

      <--- Score

      19. Is it possible to estimate the impact of unanticipated complexity such as wrong or failed assumptions, feedback, etcetera on proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you measure efficient delivery of High Finance services?

      <--- Score

      21. What is an unallowable cost?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the cost of rework?

      <--- Score

      23. What are the types and number of measures to use?

      <--- Score

      24. Why a High Finance focus?

      <--- Score

      25. What details are required of the High Finance cost structure?

      <--- Score

      26. When are costs are incurred?

      <--- Score

      27. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      28. What are the operational costs after High Finance deployment?

      <--- Score

      29. What are your customers expectations and measures?

      <--- Score

      30. What are the costs?

      <--- Score

      31. What is your High Finance quality cost segregation study?

      <--- Score

      32. Where is the cost?

      <--- Score

      33. When should you bother with diagrams?

      <--- Score

      34. What are the costs of reform?

      <--- Score

      35. How can you measure the performance?

      <--- Score

      36. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

      <--- Score

      37. What measurements are being captured?

      <--- Score

      38. How do you measure success?

      <--- Score

      39. What can be used to verify compliance?

      <--- Score

      40. Have you included everything in your High Finance cost models?

      <--- Score

      41. How do you verify if High Finance is built right?

      <--- Score

      42. What is measured? Why?

      <--- Score

      43. The approach of traditional High Finance works for detail complexity but is focused on a systematic approach rather than an understanding of the nature of systems themselves, what approach will permit your organization to deal with the kind of unpredictable emergent behaviors that dynamic complexity can introduce?

      <--- Score

      44. What harm might be caused?

      <--- Score

      45. How can you measure High Finance in a systematic way?

      <--- Score

      46. How will effects be measured?

      <--- Score

      47. How are you verifying it?

      <--- Score

      48. How long to keep data and how to manage retention costs?

      <--- Score

      49. What are the current costs of the High Finance process?

      <--- Score

      50. How do you verify the High Finance requirements quality?

      <--- Score

      51. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

      <--- Score

      52.