Expert Software A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

if Expert Software does not deliver successfully?

      <--- Score

      63. What do you need to start doing?

      <--- Score

      64. Are you dealing with any of the same issues today as yesterday? What can you do about this?

      <--- Score

      65. What would happen if Expert Software weren’t done?

      <--- Score

      66. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Expert Software research related to market response and models?

      <--- Score

      68. What are your needs in relation to Expert Software skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

      <--- Score

      69. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?

      <--- Score

      70. Who needs what information?

      <--- Score

      71. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Expert Software will circumvent those obstacles?

      <--- Score

      72. Will it solve real problems?

      <--- Score

      73. For your Expert Software project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?

      <--- Score

      74. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?

      <--- Score

      75. Does your organization need more Expert Software education?

      <--- Score

      76. Do you need different information or graphics?

      <--- Score

      77. What is the extent or complexity of the Expert Software problem?

      <--- Score

      78. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

      <--- Score

      79. Which needs are not included or involved?

      <--- Score

      80. Which information does the Expert Software business case need to include?

      <--- Score

      81. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

      <--- Score

      82. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

      <--- Score

      84. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?

      <--- Score

      85. What Expert Software capabilities do you need?

      <--- Score

      86. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      87. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?

      <--- Score

      88. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Expert Software leader?

      <--- Score

      89. Who should resolve the Expert Software issues?

      <--- Score

      90. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Expert Software delivery, for example is new software needed?

      <--- Score

      91. Who needs budgets?

      <--- Score

      92. What activities does the governance board need to consider?

      <--- Score

      93. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?

      <--- Score

      94. Do you know what you need to know about Expert Software?

      <--- Score

      95. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Expert Software Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      2. How do you think the partners involved in Expert Software would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      3. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      4. Has the Expert Software work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      5. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      6. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Expert Software results are met?

      <--- Score

      7. Are the Expert Software requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      8. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      9. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      10. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      11. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Expert Software work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      12. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      13. What system do you use for gathering Expert Software information?

      <--- Score

      14. Are the Expert Software requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      15. Is there a Expert Software management charter, including stakeholder case, problem