Resource Economics A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      120. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      121. How do you hand over Resource economics context?

      <--- Score

      122. Is Resource economics linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      123. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      124. Is there a Resource economics management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      125. Are improvement team members fully trained on Resource economics?

      <--- Score

      126. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      127. How do you manage changes in Resource economics requirements?

      <--- Score

      128. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      129. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      130. Is Resource economics required?

      <--- Score

      131. How does the Resource economics manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      132. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      133. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      134. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      135. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      136. How can the value of Resource economics be defined?

      <--- Score

      137. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Resource economics Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How much does it cost?

      <--- Score

      2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      3. What is the cost of rework?

      <--- Score

      4. Do you have a flow diagram of what happens?

      <--- Score

      5. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

      <--- Score

      6. How to cause the change?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you verify and develop ideas and innovations?

      <--- Score

      8. Where is the cost?

      <--- Score

      9. Are missed Resource economics opportunities costing your organization money?

      <--- Score

      10. What could cause you to change course?

      <--- Score

      11. Are supply costs steady or fluctuating?

      <--- Score

      12. How do you measure efficient delivery of Resource economics services?

      <--- Score

      13. Was a business case (cost/benefit) developed?

      <--- Score

      14. What are the operational costs after Resource economics deployment?

      <--- Score

      15. Which costs should be taken into account?

      <--- Score

      16. What methods are feasible and acceptable to estimate the impact of reforms?

      <--- Score

      17. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the uncertainties surrounding estimates of impact?

      <--- Score

      19. Are there competing Resource economics priorities?

      <--- Score

      20. Are Resource economics vulnerabilities categorized and prioritized?

      <--- Score

      21. What is the total cost related to deploying Resource economics, including any consulting or professional services?

      <--- Score

      22. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Resource economics services/products?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you verify performance?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the Resource economics investment costs?

      <--- Score

      25. What would be a real cause for concern?

      <--- Score

      26. What would it cost to replace your technology?

      <--- Score

      27. Are you aware of what could cause a problem?

      <--- Score

      28. How will measures be used to manage and adapt?

      <--- Score

      29. How will effects be measured?

      <--- Score

      30. Where is it measured?

      <--- Score

      31. How do you measure variability?

      <--- Score

      32. What is an unallowable cost?

      <--- Score

      33. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      34. How do you verify the authenticity of the data and information used?

      <--- Score

      35. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

      <---