Resource Economics A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Читать онлайн.
Название Resource Economics A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Серия
Издательство Зарубежная деловая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867460237



Скачать книгу

improvement team?

      <--- Score

      9. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      10. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      11. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      12. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      13. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Resource economics changes?

      <--- Score

      14. Is there any additional Resource economics definition of success?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you manage unclear Resource economics requirements?

      <--- Score

      16. How are consistent Resource economics definitions important?

      <--- Score

      17. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      18. How would you define Resource economics leadership?

      <--- Score

      19. Is Resource economics currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      20. Will a Resource economics production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      21. What Resource economics requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      22. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      23. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      24. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Resource economics leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      25. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      26. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      27. How did the Resource economics manager receive input to the development of a Resource economics improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      28. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Resource economics goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      29. Who approved the Resource economics scope?

      <--- Score

      30. Do you have a Resource economics success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      31. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      32. Do you all define Resource economics in the same way?

      <--- Score

      33. What are the record-keeping requirements of Resource economics activities?

      <--- Score

      34. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      35. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      36. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      37. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Resource economics brings?

      <--- Score

      39. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      40. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      41. Has a Resource economics requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      42. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      43. Is the scope of Resource economics defined?

      <--- Score

      44. What are the Resource economics use cases?

      <--- Score

      45. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      46. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      47. Will team members perform Resource economics work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      48. How do you think the partners involved in Resource economics would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      49. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      50. What sources do you use to gather information for a Resource economics study?

      <--- Score

      51. What is the scope of the Resource economics work?

      <--- Score

      52. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      53. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      54. Who are the Resource economics improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      55. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      56. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      57. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      58. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      59. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      60. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      61. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      62. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      63. What are (control) requirements for Resource