Information Modelling A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      66. What are the core elements of the Information Modelling business case?

      <--- Score

      67. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      69. What happens if Information Modelling’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      70. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      72. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      73. What is the scope of the Information Modelling work?

      <--- Score

      74. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information Modelling leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      75. Are the Information Modelling requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      76. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      77. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      78. Is there any additional Information Modelling definition of success?

      <--- Score

      79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      80. How will the Information Modelling team and the group measure complete success of Information Modelling?

      <--- Score

      81. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      82. How do you catch Information Modelling definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      83. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      84. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      85. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      86. Do you all define Information Modelling in the same way?

      <--- Score

      87. Has a Information Modelling requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      88. Have all basic functions of Information Modelling been defined?

      <--- Score

      89. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      90. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      91. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      92. How do you manage changes in Information Modelling requirements?

      <--- Score

      93. How do you manage unclear Information Modelling requirements?

      <--- Score

      94. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      96. What are the Information Modelling tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Information Modelling?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there a critical path to deliver Information Modelling results?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the Information Modelling scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      100. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      101. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      102. How can the value of Information Modelling be defined?

      <--- Score

      103. Who approved the Information Modelling scope?

      <--- Score

      104. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      105. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      106. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      107. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      108. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      109. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      110. Who is gathering Information Modelling information?

      <--- Score

      111. Is the Information Modelling scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      112. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      113. Has the Information Modelling work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      114. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      115. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      116. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information Modelling activities?

      <--- Score

      117. How do you think the partners involved in Information Modelling would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      118. Is Information Modelling currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      119. What is the scope of Information Modelling?

      <--- Score

      120. Do you have a Information Modelling success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      121. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      122.