Small-Angle Scattering. Ian W. Hamley

Читать онлайн.
Название Small-Angle Scattering
Автор произведения Ian W. Hamley
Жанр Техническая литература
Серия
Издательство Техническая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119768340



Скачать книгу

alt="q Subscript italic h k l Baseline equals StartFraction 2 pi left-parenthesis h squared plus k squared plus l squared right-parenthesis Superscript 1 slash 2 Baseline Over a EndFraction"/>

      where qhkl is the position of the Bragg peak with indices hkl and a is the lattice constant.

      The general expression for all crystal systems is [12, 26]

      (1.55)StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column q Subscript italic h k l Superscript 2 2nd Column equals 4 pi squared left-bracket StartFraction h squared sine squared alpha Over a squared EndFraction plus StartFraction k squared sine squared beta Over b squared EndFraction plus StartFraction l squared sine squared gamma Over c squared EndFraction plus StartFraction 2 italic h k Over italic a b EndFraction left-parenthesis cosine alpha cosine beta minus cosine gamma right-parenthesis 2nd Row 1st Column Blank 2nd Column plus StartFraction 2 italic k l Over italic b c EndFraction left-parenthesis cosine beta cosine gamma minus cosine alpha right-parenthesis plus StartFraction 2 italic l h Over italic c a EndFraction left-parenthesis cosine gamma cosine alpha minus cosine beta right-parenthesis right-bracket slash upper X EndLayout

      with

      (1.56)upper X equals 1 plus 2 cosine alpha cosine beta cosine gamma minus cosine squared alpha minus cosine squared beta minus cosine squared gamma

Graph depicts the indexation of SAXS reflections observed for the lipid monoolein forming a bicontinuous Pn3¯m cubic structure, within cubosomes. Here, Shkl = 1/dhkl is determined from the observed position of the reflection via Shkl = qhkl/2π. The lattice constant a = (97.2 ± 1.2) Å is determined as the reciprocal of the gradient.

      Source: From Ref. [15].

Schematic illustration of the long-range versus short-range order showing schematics of real space distribution functions g(r) (left), and scattered intensity profiles I(q) (right).

      For a sample with quasi‐long‐range order, the scattering profile consists of a sharp peak with power‐law tails (Figure 1.10b). More commonly observed is short‐range order. This produces a scattering profile containing a Lorentzian peak (Figure 1.10c) given by

      (1.57)upper I left-parenthesis q right-parenthesis equals StartFraction upper I 0 Over 1 plus xi squared left-parenthesis q minus q 0 right-parenthesis squared EndFraction

      Here ξ is a correlation length and q0 = 2π/d is the peak position (d is the preferred spacing in the system). If the decay of the peaks in the correlation function is steeper, g(r) ∼ exp(−r2/ξ2), then the intensity profile shows a Gaussian peak:

      (1.58)upper I left-parenthesis q right-parenthesis equals upper I 0 exp left-bracket minus xi squared left-parenthesis q minus q 0 right-parenthesis squared right-bracket

Schematic illustration of the lattice distortions in paracrystals with lattice distortions of (a) first and (b) second kind.

      In a paracrystal with imperfections of the first kind, the long‐range lattice order is retained but there are fluctuations in position around the lattice nodes (Figure 1.11a), i.e. there is positional disorder. In the observed diffraction pattern, the peak width increases linearly with the peak order [31], and the intensity is modulated by a Debye‐Waller factor as described above [12, 31]. With lattice distortions of the second kind, the long‐range lattice order is disrupted as shown in Figure 1.11b, i.e. there is long‐range positional and bond orientational disorder. This leads to a quadratic increase in peak width with peak order [12, 31]. Analytical solutions are available for one‐dimensional paracrystal models of the first and second kind [12, 22].

      1.6.4