Pathology of Genetically Engineered and Other Mutant Mice. Группа авторов

Читать онлайн.
Название Pathology of Genetically Engineered and Other Mutant Mice
Автор произведения Группа авторов
Жанр Биология
Серия
Издательство Биология
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781119624592



Скачать книгу

distributed evenly across all chromosomes, a pattern emerges in which markers specific to AKR/J and not BALB/cByJ skew to increased homozygosity in the region of the genome specific to the mutation. Usually this works relatively quickly to identify the region in which the mutated gene is located. However, in this particular case, less than 15% of the F2 mice were affected (Table 3.7) due to modifier genes in BALB/cByJ. Similar crosses with other strains resulted in the expected 25% distribution. This illustrates two points, the deviation from Mendelian expectation due to modifiers and the value of doing mapping crosses with different inbred strains, which in this instance identified different genetic intervals that together reduced the interval and the number of candidate genes (Figure 3.6) [9, 10].

Schematic illustration of setting up a mapping cross using F1 and F2 hybrids.

      Backcrossing an F1 hybrid to one of the parents, instead of sibling intercrossing, is the initial process in the creation of a congenic, consomic, or conplastic strain, and such an N2 population is a useful tool for mapping dominant mutations. Some mutations or transgenes are adequately deleterious to overall health that they cannot be maintained on an inbred background and instead require hybrid vigor. Such mutants are maintained by breeding to an F1 hybrid at each generation or through outcross–intercross to an F1 hybrid. One complicated example of this is B6EiC3Sn a/A‐Ts(1716)65Dn/J [11]. This chromosomal aberration was induced in DBA/2J inbred mice, but is detrimental to health and causes male sterility so in order to successfully maintain a colony a female carrier is bred to a (C57BL/6JEiJ x C3H/HeSnJ)F1/J male at each generation. There is no punctuation in the genetic background of the strain name, B6EiC3Sn, and the presence of the DBA/2J contribution is omitted from the nomenclature for simplicity and must be found in sources outside of the strain nomenclature.

AKR/J‐hid* homozygote crossed with Total progeny Normal mice Affected mice Affected (%) X 2 p‐Value
BALB/cByJ 260 222 38 14.62 5.92 0.025–0.010
C57BL/6J 430 330 100 23.26 0.220 0.500–0.750
CAST/EiJ 339 255 84 24.78 0.003 >0.900
C3H/HeJ 248 191 57 22.98 0.170 0.500–0.750
FVB/NJ 272 205 67 24.63 0.006 >0.900
Total F2 mice 1549 1203 346

      * AKR/J‐hid was the original designation until the gene responsible was identified. Because the gene was identified with a different phenotype earlier, the allele is officially Soat1ald not Soat1hid.

Schematic illustration of crossing AKR/J mice with more than one inbred strain to map the mutant gene locus.

      Sources: Based on Giehl KA et al. [9].