Smart Grid Telecommunications. Ramon Ferrús

telecommunication capabilities to any location.

       Telecommunications network intelligence closer to the network end‐points, helping to provide low latency services that might be demanded by some users.

      Thus, another level of complexity is added to the Smart Grid distributed intelligence discussion that should consider these new trends of telecommunications market.

      1.6.8 Resilient Telecommunication Networks and Services

      Two different concepts mix when referring to resiliency in telecommunications: reliability and resiliency. Before we refer to them, we need first to focus our attention on the availability concept, prevalent in the measurement of the service conditions.

Availability is defined in ITU‐T E.800 as the ability “of an item to be in the state to perform a required function at a given instant of time or at any instant of time within a given time interval, assuming that the external resources, if required, are provided.” When the network is available, its performance can be observed and measured. Many ITU‐T and ITU‐R recommendations define availability objectives. Few references, however, exist for Smart Grid‐related telecommunication services, although it can be broadly assumed that the strictest Smart Grid services need 99.999% availability (this means 315.36 seconds of unavailability during the year).

      To have networks and services in the “available” state, reliability concept appears. It is defined in ITU‐T E.800 as “the probability that an item can perform a required function under stated conditions for a given time interval.” Reliability is different to resiliency. Resiliency can be defined as “the ability of an entity, system, network or service to resist the effects of a disruptive event, or to recover from the effects of a disruptive event to a normal or near‐normal state” [62]. Thus, while reliability focuses on preventing that the system fails, resilience focuses on recovering when it fails.

      Resilience in telecommunications implies carrier‐grade (carrier‐class) network elements (equipment with redundancy in its vital parts – such as power supply), reliable design of network links (with the proper availability assurance), protection of paths through redundant routes that will not fail simultaneously, licensed spectrum usage (legally protected not be interfered), battery backup, etc. While these elements can be properly controlled in private networks, it can just be controlled through SLAs in commercial services.

      Finally, security or cybersecurity aspects need to be mentioned. Security aspects must be considered even if only related to the availability of networks, as attacks can turn any network or service into either a non‐performing one or a non‐available one (e.g., denial‐of‐service [63]). As an example of this importance, North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) has developed and enforced regulations that demonstrate the importance of security in electric utilities. Security is not just an add‐on of telecommunication networks, but a by‐design aspect that needs to be present at any stage of the telecommunication service and its network components (technology definition, products implementation, deployment, operations, and delivery).

      1.6.9 Telecommunications Special Solution for Utilities

      The deployment of Smart Grids involves a transformation of the electric grid infrastructure, specifically Distribution grid infrastructure. This infrastructure is closely connected to the grid. The fact that the electric infrastructure has many aspects in common with the infrastructure aspects of telecommunication networks opens the door for synergies. In particular, there are several elements that are available for utilities, and in some cases, exclusive to them, that are used to deploy telecommunications infrastructures for the Smart Grid:

       Rights of way. Rights of way have been necessary to deploy substations and power lines and their associated sites, towers, poles, and ducts. These infrastructure elements can host other cables (not only power lines) for telecommunication purposes. In fact, there is an abundance of examples of this carriers' carrier business model that has been used for the expansion of existing telecommunication networks [64]. Legislative bodies around the world have also granted the use of these existing rights of way to TSPs.

       Optical fiber cables, unique to utilities. To take advantage of towers, ducts, and cables where optical fiber can be deployed in close proximity to HV power lines, special cables have been developed and are today of wide‐spread use (see Chapter 2). HV and LV solutions exist to carry optical fiber close to or inside power cables as well.

       Towers and poles are used and can host radio base station to gain height and improve coverage within existing assets. This possibility minimizes costs and quickens deployments of radio (wireless) solutions.

       Power Line Communications (PLC) are the way to support the transmission of telecommunication signals inside electric power cables. This technology is as diverse and versatile as radio (wireless) and has helped utilities through all ages to communicate distant points among them, for voice communication purposes, low (64 kbps) and high (200 Mbps) data rate needs.

       Surface waves working around all sorts of overhead electricity cables, both naked or jacketed [65]. An application example of this technology is being developed and promoted by [66] and its future is uncertain.

References

      1 1 Department of Energy – USA (2017). Transforming the Nation's Electricity System: The Second Installment of the Quadrennial Energy Review (DOE/EPSA‐0008) [Online]. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/02/f34/Quadrennial%20Energy%20Review‐‐Second%20Installment%20%28Full%20Report%29.pdf (accessed 4 October 2020).

      2 2 Constable, G. and Somerville, B. (2003). A Century of Innovation: Twenty Engineering Achievements that Transformed Our Lives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

      3 3 (2017). Universal energy access by 2030 is now within reach thanks to growing political will and falling costs – news. Energy Access Outlook 2017 (19 October 2017). https://www.iea.org/news/universal‐energy‐access‐by‐2030‐is‐now‐within‐reach‐thanks‐to‐growing‐political‐will‐and‐falling‐costs (accessed 24 October 2020).

      4 4 Pérez‐Arriaga, I.J. (ed.) (2013). Regulation of the Power Sector. London: Springer‐Verlag.

      5 5 IEC (2020). World Plugs: List View by Frequency. https://www.iec.ch/worldplugs/list_byfrequency.htm (accessed 24 October 2020).

      6 6 IEC 60050 (2020). International electrotechnical vocabulary – welcome. Electropedia: The World's Online Electrotechnical Vocabulary. http://www.electropedia.org/ (accessed 18 October 2020).

      7 7 Goodman, F.R. (1998). Integration of Distributed Resources in Electric Utility Systems: Current Interconnection Practice and Unified Approach. Electric Power Research Institute – EPRI, Technical TR‐111489. https://www.epri.com/research/products/TR‐111489 (accessed 24 October 2020).

      8 8 IEEE Std 1547‐2018 (2018). Standard for Interconnection and Interoperability of Distributed Energy Resources with Associated Electric Power Systems Interfaces. IEEE [online]. https://standards.ieee.org/standard/1547‐2018.html (accessed 8 October 2020).

      9 9 (2007). The Potential Benefits of Distributed Generation and the Rate‐Related Issues that may Impede Its Expansion. Report Pursuant to Section 1817 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (June 2007) [Online]. https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020‐04/1817_study_sep_07.pdf