Museum Transformations. Группа авторов

tour groups from Germany and abroad plan a quick stop at the memorial from Potsdamer Platz, and then depart for the government district and the Brandenburg Gate. Here, the memorial appears as just another tourist attraction, at which people do not spend much time, nor are they very well prepared. The center’s guest book, however, shows that many visitors come especially for the memorial and the center. The exhibition has audio guides in various languages, and leaflets are available in 20 languages. The texts of the exhibition are only in German and English because of spatial limitations, but the foundation offers regular guided tours in several languages. These tours contain information on the history of the memorial’s inception and realization, the history of the site, the architecture of the field of stelae, and an introduction to the main themes of the exhibition. One visitor wrote: “At the beginning, I thought the memorial was strange, even devoid of meaning, but after the tour of the underground part, I was overwhelmed” (Guest book, June 24, 2008, Archives of the Foundation).

A moving experience

      This is what happens to many people who have passed through the memorial and then visited the center. After returning from the subterranean exhibition to daylight and into the memorial visitors often feel changed. Many are moved to tears. It might be a common experience that people, after they have visited the center, are able to really feel the essence of the site, which Agamben (quoted at the beginning of this chapter) described in a poetic way. As architect Peter Eisenman (2005a), who was originally opposed to the center, put it in an interview with the the Nation: “It’s not just the columns and it’s not just the archive it’s the fact that they stand together, and you have to see them apart and together and understand the edge between the two.” The interaction of both, the memorial and the underground center, makes this a unique and very special place of Holocaust commemoration in the German capital. Would the memorial have the same effect without the center and vice versa? Both would not be the same. The memorial would probably be perceived by many who have no knowledge of the Holocaust as an adventure playground; the information center discreetly hidden underground “needs the attraction of the field of stelae to draw visitors and to be properly valued,” Brigitte Sion observes (2008, 216). In the center, the presence of the great memorial above can be felt. When we leave the exhibition and go up to the memorial, we have more knowledge, and above all take images and traces of the victims with us while we experience the memorial anew. Together, these two parts of the ensemble “offer an original and moving experience of Holocaust memory, but not separately” (Sion 2008, 216).

References

      Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. “Die zwei Gedächtnisse” [The two memories]. Die Zeit 19, May 4. Accessed April 7, 2014. http://www.zeit.de/2005/19/Mahnmal_2f_Agamben/komplettansicht.

      Baranowski, Daniel, ed. 2009. “Ich bin die Stimme der Millionen”: Das Videoarchiv im Ort der Information [“I am the voice of the million”: The video archive at the Information Center]. Berlin: Stiftung Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas.

      Baumann, Ulrich. 2011. “‘Sinn aus der Tiefe’: Der ‘Ort der Information’ am Holocaustdenkmal in Berlin” [“Meaning from the depths”: The Information Center at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin]. In Die Verfolgung der Juden während der NS-Zeit: Stand und Perspektiven der Dokumentation der Vermittlung und der Erinnerung [The persecution of the Jews during the Nazi era: The state and perspectives of the documentation, presentation, and remembrance of the Holocaust], edited by Andreas Hedwig, Reinhard Neebe, and Annegret Wenz-Haubfleisch, 167–183. Schriften des Hessischen Staatsarchivs, Vol. 24. Marburg, Germany: Hessisches Staatsarchiv.

      Carrier, Peter. 2005. Holocaust Monuments and National Memory Cultures in France and Germany since 1989: The Origins and Political Function of the Vél d’Hiv in Paris and the Holocaust Monument in Berlin. New York: Berghahn.

Cullen, Michael S., ed. 1999. Das Holocaust-Mahnmal: Dokumentation einer Debatte [The Holocaust Memorial: Documentation of a debate]. Zürich: Pendo.

      Dekel, Irit. 2008. “Public Passages: Political Action in and around the Holocaust Memorial, Berlin.” Doctoral dissertation, New School for Social Research, New York.

      Dekel, Irit. 2011. “Mediated Space, Mediated Memory: New Archives at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin.” In On Media Memory, edited by Motti Neiger, Oren Meyers, and Eyal Zandberg, 265–277. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

      Deutscher Bundestag. 1999. “Resolution by the German Bundestag.” Stiftung Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas. Last modified 2013. http://www.stiftung-denkmal.de/en/foundation/founding-chronology-of-the-foundation/beschluss.html#c354.

      Eisenman, Peter. 2005a. “Collective Memory and the Holocaust.” Nation, May 31. Accessed May 12, 2014. http://www.thenation.com/print/article/collective-memory-and-holocaust.

      Eisenman, Peter. 2005b. “Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe.” In Materials on the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, edited by Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, 10–13. Berlin: Nicolaische.

      Evans, Richard J. 1989. In Hitler’s Shadow: West German Historians and the Attempt to Escape from the Nazi Past. New York: Pantheon.

      Foundation Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe, ed. 2010. Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe: Guide to the Information Centre. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.

      Frei, Norbert. 2002. Adenauer’s Germany and the Nazi Past: The Politics of Amnesty and Integration. Translated by Joel Golb. New York: Columbia University Press.

      Geissler, Corneilia. 2011. “Zur aktuellen Repräsentation des Nationalsozialismus an Orten des Gedenkens: Überlegungen zu Möglichkeiten und Grenzen subjektorientierter Zugänge in der Ausstellungsdidaktik” [On the actual representation of National Socialism at historical sites of remembrance: Possibilities and limits of subject-oriented exhibition didactics]. In Die Erinnerung an die nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslager: Akteure, Inhalte, Strategien [Remembering the National Socialist concentration camps: Actors, themes, strategies], edited by Andreas Ehresmann, Phillip Neumann, Alexander Prenninger, and Regis Schlagdenhauffen, 204–220. Berlin: Metropol.

      Hayes, Peter. 2001. Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Hayes, Peter. 2004. From Cooperation to Complicity: Degussa in the Third Reich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      Heimrod, Ute, Günter Schlusche, and Horst Seferens, eds. 1999. Der Denkmalstreit das Denkmal? Die Debatte um das Denkmal für die ermordeten Juden Europas, Eine Dokumentation [The debate as memorial? The struggle over the Memorial of the Murdered Jews of Europe]. Berlin: Philo.

      Herf, Jeffrey. 1997. Divided Memory: The Nazi Past in the Two Germanys. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

      Huyssen, Andreas. 2003. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

      Jeismann, Michael, ed. 1999. Mahnmal Mitte: Eine Kontroverse [The memorial in the center of Berlin: A controversy]. Cologne: DuMont.

      Jordan, Jennifer A. 2006. Structure of Memory: Understanding Urban Change in Berlin and Beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Kirsch, Jan-Holger. 2003. Nationaler Mythos oder historische Trauer? Der Streit um ein zentrales “Holocaust-Mahnmal” für die Berliner Republik [National myth or historic mourning? The struggle over a central Holocaust memorial for the Berlin republic]. Cologne: Böhlau.

      Klein, Marion. 2012. Schülerinnen