DRIVE Technology A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      71. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      72. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      73. Is there a critical path to deliver DRIVE Technology results?

      <--- Score

      74. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      75. Has the DRIVE Technology work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      76. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      77. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      78. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      79. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      80. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      81. What are the DRIVE Technology tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      82. What would be the goal or target for a DRIVE Technology’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      83. How will the DRIVE Technology team and the group measure complete success of DRIVE Technology?

      <--- Score

      84. Is there a clear DRIVE Technology case definition?

      <--- Score

      85. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      86. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      87. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      88. What happens if DRIVE Technology’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      89. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      90. How did the DRIVE Technology manager receive input to the development of a DRIVE Technology improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      91. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      92. Are team charters developed?

      <--- Score

      93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform DRIVE Technology work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      94. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      95. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      96. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      97. How do you catch DRIVE Technology definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      98. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      99. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      100. When is/was the DRIVE Technology start date?

      <--- Score

      101. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      102. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      103. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      104. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      105. What is the scope of the DRIVE Technology work?

      <--- Score

      106. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      107. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      108. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to DRIVE Technology changes?

      <--- Score

      109. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      110. What DRIVE Technology services do you require?

      <--- Score

      111. How do you manage unclear DRIVE Technology requirements?

      <--- Score

      112. Do you have a DRIVE Technology success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      113. Is the DRIVE Technology scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      114. Is DRIVE Technology linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the DRIVE Technology scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      116. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      117. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      118. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      119. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      120. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      121. What is the scope of the DRIVE Technology effort?

      <--- Score

      122. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      123. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      124. What are the boundaries of the scope?