Capability Security A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      71. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      72. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      73. Will a Capability security production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      74. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      75. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      76. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      77. What Capability security requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      78. How does the Capability security manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      79. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you manage unclear Capability security requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. Are improvement team members fully trained on Capability security?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the scope of the Capability security effort?

      <--- Score

      83. Are accountability and ownership for Capability security clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      84. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      85. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      86. How would you define Capability security leadership?

      <--- Score

      87. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      88. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      89. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the scope of the Capability security work?

      <--- Score

      91. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      92. What sources do you use to gather information for a Capability security study?

      <--- Score

      93. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      94. What is the definition of Capability security excellence?

      <--- Score

      95. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Capability security goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      96. Is Capability security currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      97. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      98. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      99. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      100. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Capability security leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      101. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      102. What Capability security services do you require?

      <--- Score

      103. Is Capability security required?

      <--- Score

      104. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      105. When is/was the Capability security start date?

      <--- Score

      106. How will the Capability security team and the group measure complete success of Capability security?

      <--- Score

      107. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      108. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      109. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      110. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      111. Who approved the Capability security scope?

      <--- Score

      112. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      113. What are (control) requirements for Capability security Information?

      <--- Score

      114. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      115. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      116. Are the Capability security requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      117. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      118. Is there a critical path to deliver Capability security results?

      <--- Score

      119. Has a Capability security requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      120. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      121. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      122. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      123. Is there a Capability security management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      124. Is the Capability security scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      125. What knowledge or experience