Environmental Finance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      113. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

      <--- Score

      114. What can be used to verify compliance?

      <--- Score

      115. Do you have an issue in getting priority?

      <--- Score

      116. Are the units of measure consistent?

      <--- Score

      117. What are you verifying?

      <--- Score

      118. Is there an opportunity to verify requirements?

      <--- Score

      119. Why do you expend time and effort to implement measurement, for whom?

      <--- Score

      120. What evidence is there and what is measured?

      <--- Score

      121. Among the Environmental finance product and service cost to be estimated, which is considered hardest to estimate?

      <--- Score

      122. What measurements are being captured?

      <--- Score

      123. Did you tackle the cause or the symptom?

      <--- Score

      124. What are hidden Environmental finance quality costs?

      <--- Score

      125. What are the costs of reform?

      <--- Score

      126. What is the cause of any Environmental finance gaps?

      <--- Score

      127. What could cause delays in the schedule?

      <--- Score

      128. What does your operating model cost?

      <--- Score

      129. How do you verify your resources?

      <--- Score

      130. Are there competing Environmental finance priorities?

      <--- Score

      131. Does management have the right priorities among projects?

      <--- Score

      132. Are you taking your company in the direction of better and revenue or cheaper and cost?

      <--- Score

      133. What is your decision requirements diagram?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Environmental finance Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #4: ANALYZE:

      INTENT: Analyze causes, assumptions and hypotheses.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What is the oversight process?

      <--- Score

      2. How is the Environmental finance Value Stream Mapping managed?

      <--- Score

      3. What is the cost of poor quality as supported by the team’s analysis?

      <--- Score

      4. Is the gap/opportunity displayed and communicated in financial terms?

      <--- Score

      5. What data do you need to collect?

      <--- Score