Environmental Finance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      16. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Environmental finance goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      17. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      18. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      19. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Environmental finance?

      <--- Score

      20. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      21. Will a Environmental finance production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      22. What are the Environmental finance use cases?

      <--- Score

      23. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      24. Is there a clear Environmental finance case definition?

      <--- Score

      25. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Environmental finance leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      26. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      27. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      28. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      29. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Environmental finance work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      30. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      31. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      32. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      33. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      35. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      36. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      37. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      38. What are (control) requirements for Environmental finance Information?

      <--- Score

      39. Do you have a Environmental finance success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      40. What would be the goal or target for a Environmental finance’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      41. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      42. Why are you doing Environmental finance and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      43. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      44. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Environmental finance results are met?

      <--- Score

      45. Is Environmental finance required?

      <--- Score

      46. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      47. Is special Environmental finance user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      48. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      49. Is the Environmental finance scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      50. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      51. Is there a critical path to deliver Environmental finance results?

      <--- Score

      52. Are the Environmental finance requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      53. How do you manage changes in Environmental finance requirements?

      <--- Score

      54. How have you defined all Environmental finance requirements first?

      <--- Score

      55. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      56. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      57. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      58. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      59. Who approved the Environmental finance scope?

      <--- Score

      60. Has the Environmental finance work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      61. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      62. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      63. Do you all define Environmental finance in the same way?

      <--- Score

      64. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      65. What system do you use for gathering Environmental finance information?

      <--- Score

      66. Is Environmental finance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      67. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      68. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      69. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      70. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      71. Is Environmental finance currently on schedule according to the plan?