.
Читать онлайн.
<--- Score
118. Have all basic functions of Threat and risk assessment been defined?
<--- Score
119. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
120. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
121. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
122. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
123. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
124. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
125. Do you have a Threat and risk assessment success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
126. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
127. Are resources adequate for the scope?
<--- Score
128. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
129. Who are the Threat and risk assessment improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
130. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Threat and risk assessment?
<--- Score
131. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
132. Are accountability and ownership for Threat and risk assessment clearly defined?
<--- Score
133. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Threat and risk assessment Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What measurements are being captured?
<--- Score
2. Have you made assumptions about the shape of the future, particularly its impact on your customers and competitors?
<--- Score
3. How will you measure success?
<--- Score
4. Has a cost center been established?
<--- Score
5. How do you verify the Threat and risk assessment requirements quality?
<--- Score
6. What causes extra work or rework?
<--- Score
7. What does verifying compliance entail?
<--- Score
8. How are measurements made?
<--- Score
9. How is progress measured?
<--- Score
10. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?
<--- Score
11. How do you verify performance?
<--- Score
12. What are the Threat and risk assessment key cost drivers?
<--- Score
13. What does a Test Case verify?
<--- Score
14. Are you able to realize any cost savings?
<--- Score
15. Do you have any cost Threat and risk assessment limitation requirements?
<--- Score
16. How do you measure success?
<--- Score
17. What are your primary costs, revenues, assets?
<--- Score
18. How are costs allocated?
<--- Score
19. What are your key Threat and risk assessment organizational performance measures, including key short and longer-term financial measures?
<--- Score
20. How can you reduce the costs of obtaining inputs?
<--- Score
21. Why a Threat and risk assessment focus?
<--- Score
22. What are your operating costs?
<--- Score
23. Which measures and indicators matter?
<--- Score
24. How do you prevent mis-estimating cost?
<--- Score
25. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?
<--- Score
26. Does management have the right priorities among projects?
<--- Score
27. How to cause the change?
<--- Score
28. How will costs be allocated?
<--- Score
29. How will you measure your Threat and risk assessment effectiveness?
<--- Score
30. What could cause delays in the schedule?
<--- Score
31. What are allowable costs?
<--- Score
32. Are there competing Threat and risk assessment priorities?
<--- Score
33. What is your Threat and risk assessment quality cost segregation study?
<--- Score
34. Are the units of measure consistent?
<--- Score
35. At what cost?
<--- Score
36. Is there an opportunity