Threat And Risk Assessment A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Читать онлайн.
Название Threat And Risk Assessment A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Серия
Издательство Зарубежная деловая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867458524



Скачать книгу

and risk assessment results?

      <--- Score

      61. Is Threat and risk assessment required?

      <--- Score

      62. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      63. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      64. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      65. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      66. How do you gather Threat and risk assessment requirements?

      <--- Score

      67. How did the Threat and risk assessment manager receive input to the development of a Threat and risk assessment improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      68. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      69. How does the Threat and risk assessment manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      70. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      71. How have you defined all Threat and risk assessment requirements first?

      <--- Score

      72. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      73. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Threat and risk assessment brings?

      <--- Score

      74. How will the Threat and risk assessment team and the group measure complete success of Threat and risk assessment?

      <--- Score

      75. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      76. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Threat and risk assessment work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      77. What are the record-keeping requirements of Threat and risk assessment activities?

      <--- Score

      78. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Threat and risk assessment results are met?

      <--- Score

      79. How can the value of Threat and risk assessment be defined?

      <--- Score

      80. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      81. What is the scope of the Threat and risk assessment work?

      <--- Score

      82. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      83. What system do you use for gathering Threat and risk assessment information?

      <--- Score

      84. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      85. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      86. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      87. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      88. What is the scope of Threat and risk assessment?

      <--- Score

      89. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      90. Is Threat and risk assessment currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      91. What is the definition of Threat and risk assessment excellence?

      <--- Score

      92. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      93. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      94. How do you think the partners involved in Threat and risk assessment would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      95. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Threat and risk assessment leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      96. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      97. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      98. How do you hand over Threat and risk assessment context?

      <--- Score

      99. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      100. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      101. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      102. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      103. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      104. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      105. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      106. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      107. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      108. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      109. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      110. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      111. Do you all define Threat and risk assessment in the same way?

      <--- Score

      112. Will a Threat and risk assessment production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      113. How do you catch Threat and risk assessment definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      114. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the Threat and risk assessment scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      116. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      117. Has the Threat and risk assessment work been fairly and/or equitably