Fault Tolerant System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Читать онлайн.
Название Fault Tolerant System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор произведения Gerardus Blokdyk
Жанр Зарубежная деловая литература
Серия
Издательство Зарубежная деловая литература
Год выпуска 0
isbn 9781867461036



Скачать книгу

Score

      73. What system do you use for gathering Fault tolerant system information?

      <--- Score

      74. When is/was the Fault tolerant system start date?

      <--- Score

      75. Are the Fault tolerant system requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      76. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      77. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      78. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      79. How do you gather Fault tolerant system requirements?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      81. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      83. Is special Fault tolerant system user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      84. Is Fault tolerant system currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      85. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      86. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      87. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      88. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Fault tolerant system goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      89. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      90. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      91. How would you define Fault tolerant system leadership?

      <--- Score

      92. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      94. Are accountability and ownership for Fault tolerant system clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      95. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      96. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Fault tolerant system brings?

      <--- Score

      97. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      98. Is the Fault tolerant system scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      99. What Fault tolerant system services do you require?

      <--- Score

      100. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      101. How does the Fault tolerant system manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      102. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      103. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      104. What is the scope of the Fault tolerant system effort?

      <--- Score

      105. How do you hand over Fault tolerant system context?

      <--- Score

      106. Has the Fault tolerant system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      107. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      108. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      109. Is knowledge of EEE Parts Failure Modes Required To Build a Fault Tolerant System?

      <--- Score

      110. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      111. Is there a critical path to deliver Fault tolerant system results?

      <--- Score

      112. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      113. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      114. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      115. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      116. Is there any additional Fault tolerant system definition of success?

      <--- Score

      117. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      118. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      119. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      120. Why are you doing Fault tolerant system and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      121. What are the record-keeping requirements of Fault tolerant system activities?

      <--- Score

      122. Is Fault tolerant system required?

      <--- Score

      123. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      124. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Fault tolerant system? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      125. How will the Fault tolerant system team and the group measure complete success of Fault tolerant system?

      <--- Score

      126. Have all basic functions of Fault tolerant system been defined?

      <--- Score

      127. What sources do you use to gather information for a Fault tolerant system study?

      <--- Score

      128. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <---