Fault Tolerant System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      56. How do you recognize an objection?

      <--- Score

      57. What extra resources will you need?

      <--- Score

      58. What is the extent or complexity of the Fault tolerant system problem?

      <--- Score

      59. Where is training needed?

      <--- Score

      60. Will Fault tolerant system deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?

      <--- Score

      61. What vendors make products that address the Fault tolerant system needs?

      <--- Score

      62. Do you need different information or graphics?

      <--- Score

      63. Why is this needed?

      <--- Score

      64. Does your organization need more Fault tolerant system education?

      <--- Score

      65. How do you recognize an Fault tolerant system objection?

      <--- Score

      66. What are the stakeholder objectives to be achieved with Fault tolerant system?

      <--- Score

      67. How do you identify subcontractor relationships?

      <--- Score

      68. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Fault tolerant system leader?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the need for organizational change recognized?

      <--- Score

      70. How are the Fault tolerant system’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the clients issues and concerns?

      <--- Score

      72. What are the expected benefits of Fault tolerant system to the stakeholder?

      <--- Score

      73. Who needs budgets?

      <--- Score

      74. Which needs are not included or involved?

      <--- Score

      75. Who needs to know?

      <--- Score

      76. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?

      <--- Score

      77. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?

      <--- Score

      78. Are problem definition and motivation clearly presented?

      <--- Score

      79. Who else hopes to benefit from it?

      <--- Score

      80. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?

      <--- Score

      81. Is it needed?

      <--- Score

      82. Which information does the Fault tolerant system business case need to include?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

      <--- Score

      84. How do you assess your Fault tolerant system workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

      <--- Score

      85. Does Fault tolerant system create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?

      <--- Score

      86. Is the quality assurance team identified?

      <--- Score

      87. Have you identified your Fault tolerant system key performance indicators?

      <--- Score

      88. What needs to be done?

      <--- Score

      89. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Fault tolerant system project?

      <--- Score

      90. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?

      <--- Score

      91. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Fault tolerant system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Who approved the Fault tolerant system scope?

      <--- Score

      2. Is the scope of Fault tolerant system defined?

      <--- Score

      3. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      4. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      5. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      6. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you manage changes in Fault tolerant system requirements?

      <--- Score

      8. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      9. Do you have a Fault tolerant system success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      10. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      11. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      12. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      13. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Fault tolerant system work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      14. What is the scope of the Fault tolerant system work?

      <--- Score

      15. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <---