Person Analysis A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      73. What are the core elements of the Person Analysis business case?

      <--- Score

      74. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      75. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      76. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      77. How do you hand over Person Analysis context?

      <--- Score

      78. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      79. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you gather Person Analysis requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. Who are the Person Analysis improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      82. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      83. Do you have a Person Analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      84. What sources do you use to gather information for a Person Analysis study?

      <--- Score

      85. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      86. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      87. What are (control) requirements for Person Analysis Information?

      <--- Score

      88. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      89. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      91. Who approved the Person Analysis scope?

      <--- Score

      92. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      93. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      94. Is Person Analysis required?

      <--- Score

      95. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      96. Has a Person Analysis requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      97. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there a Person Analysis management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      99. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      100. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      101. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Person Analysis brings?

      <--- Score

      102. Is Person Analysis linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      103. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      104. What are the Person Analysis use cases?

      <--- Score

      105. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      106. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      107. What are the Person Analysis tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      108. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      109. Will a Person Analysis production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      110. Have all basic functions of Person Analysis been defined?

      <--- Score

      111. What would be the goal or target for a Person Analysis’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      112. Are the Person Analysis requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      113. Are accountability and ownership for Person Analysis clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      114. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      115. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      116. Is there a clear Person Analysis case definition?

      <--- Score

      117. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      118. Will team members regularly document their Person Analysis work?

      <--- Score

      119. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      120. What Person Analysis requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      121. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      122. What is the scope of the Person Analysis work?

      <--- Score

      123. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Person Analysis work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      124. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      125. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      126. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      127. What Person Analysis services do you require?

      <--- Score

      128. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      129. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <---