Regional Health Information Organization A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Regional Health Information Organization Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Who are the Regional Health Information Organization improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      2. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      3. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      4. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      5. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      6. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      7. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      8. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      9. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      10. Who is gathering Regional Health Information Organization information?

      <--- Score

      11. What Regional Health Information Organization requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      12. What is the definition of Regional Health Information Organization excellence?

      <--- Score

      13. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Regional Health Information Organization results are met?

      <--- Score

      14. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      15. Is special Regional Health Information Organization user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      16. Are accountability and ownership for Regional Health Information Organization clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      17. Why are you doing Regional Health Information Organization and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      18. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      19. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      20. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      21. What happens if Regional Health Information Organization’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      22. How do you think the partners involved in Regional Health Information Organization would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      23. Are the Regional Health Information Organization requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the Regional Health Information Organization tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      25. Is Regional Health Information Organization currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      26. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      27. Who approved the Regional Health Information Organization scope?

      <--- Score

      28. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      29. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      30. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      31. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      32. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      33. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      34. Do you all define Regional Health Information Organization in the same way?

      <--- Score

      35. Will team members perform Regional Health Information Organization work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      36. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Regional Health Information Organization? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      37. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Regional Health Information Organization goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      38. What is the scope of Regional Health Information Organization?

      <--- Score

      39. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      40. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      41. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      42. Has a Regional Health Information Organization requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      43. How will the Regional Health Information Organization team and the group measure complete success of Regional Health Information Organization?

      <--- Score

      44. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      45. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      46. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      47. How do you manage unclear Regional Health Information Organization requirements?

      <--- Score

      48. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      49. How