Programmable System On A Chip A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      57. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      58. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      59. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      60. How can the value of Programmable system on a chip be defined?

      <--- Score

      61. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      62. Is Programmable system on a chip required?

      <--- Score

      63. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      64. What are (control) requirements for Programmable system on a chip Information?

      <--- Score

      65. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      66. How did the Programmable system on a chip manager receive input to the development of a Programmable system on a chip improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      67. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      68. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      69. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      70. What Programmable system on a chip services do you require?

      <--- Score

      71. How does the Programmable system on a chip manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      72. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      73. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      74. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      75. How do you manage changes in Programmable system on a chip requirements?

      <--- Score

      76. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      77. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      78. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      79. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      80. What sources do you use to gather information for a Programmable system on a chip study?

      <--- Score

      81. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      82. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      83. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      84. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      85. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      86. What is the scope of the Programmable system on a chip work?

      <--- Score

      87. Is Programmable system on a chip linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      88. Is there a clear Programmable system on a chip case definition?

      <--- Score

      89. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      90. Is the Programmable system on a chip scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      91. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      92. What Programmable system on a chip requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      93. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Programmable system on a chip work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      94. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the scope of the Programmable system on a chip effort?

      <--- Score

      96. Is special Programmable system on a chip user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      97. Are accountability and ownership for Programmable system on a chip clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      98. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      99. Will team members perform Programmable system on a chip work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      100. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      101. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      102. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      103. Have all basic functions of Programmable system on a chip been defined?

      <--- Score

      104. Is Programmable system on a chip currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      105. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      106. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      107. Who are the Programmable system on a chip improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      108. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      109. How have you defined all Programmable system on a chip requirements first?

      <--- Score

      110. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      111. Has the