Programmable System On A Chip A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

involved in Programmable system on a chip would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      4. How are consistent Programmable system on a chip definitions important?

      <--- Score

      5. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      6. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      7. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      8. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      9. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      10. What are the record-keeping requirements of Programmable system on a chip activities?

      <--- Score

      11. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      12. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      13. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Programmable system on a chip leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      14. How do you hand over Programmable system on a chip context?

      <--- Score

      15. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      16. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      17. Why are you doing Programmable system on a chip and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      18. What are the Programmable system on a chip use cases?

      <--- Score

      19. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      20. How do you catch Programmable system on a chip definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      21. What are the core elements of the Programmable system on a chip business case?

      <--- Score

      22. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      23. Is there a critical path to deliver Programmable system on a chip results?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you gather Programmable system on a chip requirements?

      <--- Score

      25. Are the Programmable system on a chip requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      26. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      27. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      28. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      29. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Programmable system on a chip? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      30. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      31. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      32. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      34. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      35. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      36. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      37. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Programmable system on a chip goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      39. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      40. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      41. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Programmable system on a chip results are met?

      <--- Score

      42. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      43. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      44. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      45. Are improvement team members fully trained on Programmable system on a chip?

      <--- Score

      46. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      47. Is there any additional Programmable system on a chip definition of success?

      <--- Score

      48. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      49. What system do you use for gathering Programmable system on a chip information?

      <--- Score

      50. What would be the goal or target for a Programmable system on a chip’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      51. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Programmable system on a chip changes?

      <--- Score

      52. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      53. What is the definition of Programmable system on a chip excellence?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the Programmable system on a chip scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      55. How will the Programmable system on a chip team and the group measure complete success of Programmable system on a chip?

      <--- Score

      56. Are different versions