Health Action Process Approach A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      3. What are the core elements of the Health action process approach business case?

      <--- Score

      4. What Health action process approach requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      5. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      6. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Health action process approach?

      <--- Score

      7. How do you manage changes in Health action process approach requirements?

      <--- Score

      8. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      9. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      10. When is/was the Health action process approach start date?

      <--- Score

      11. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      12. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      13. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      15. What would be the goal or target for a Health action process approach’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      16. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      17. Is there any additional Health action process approach definition of success?

      <--- Score

      18. How does the Health action process approach manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      19. How would you define Health action process approach leadership?

      <--- Score

      20. What is the scope of the Health action process approach work?

      <--- Score

      21. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      22. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      23. Are the Health action process approach requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      24. How have you defined all Health action process approach requirements first?

      <--- Score

      25. Is there a critical path to deliver Health action process approach results?

      <--- Score

      26. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      27. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      28. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      29. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      30. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      31. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      32. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Health action process approach leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      33. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      34. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      35. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      36. What happens if Health action process approach’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      37. What are the record-keeping requirements of Health action process approach activities?

      <--- Score

      38. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      39. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      40. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      41. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      42. Is the scope of Health action process approach defined?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the scope of Health action process approach?

      <--- Score

      44. Has a Health action process approach requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      45. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      46. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      47. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      48. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      49. Is the Health action process approach scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      50. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      51. How did the Health action process approach manager receive input to the development of a Health action process approach improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      52. What system do you use for gathering Health action process approach information?

      <--- Score

      53. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      54. What are (control) requirements for Health action process approach Information?

      <--- Score

      55. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      56. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      57. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Health action process approach work?