Название | Self Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Gerardus Blokdyk |
Жанр | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Серия | |
Издательство | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781867458944 |
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Self-service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. Is the Self-service scope manageable?
<--- Score
2. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Self-service results are met?
<--- Score
3. What are the core elements of the Self-service business case?
<--- Score
4. What are the Self-service use cases?
<--- Score
5. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
6. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
7. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
8. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
9. Is the Self-service scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
10. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?
<--- Score
11. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
12. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
13. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
14. What are the operating system and browser requirements for the SAP Employee Self-Service?
<--- Score
15. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
16. When is the estimated completion date?
<--- Score
17. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
18. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
19. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
20. When is/was the Self-service start date?
<--- Score
21. Do you all define Self-service in the same way?
<--- Score
22. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
23. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
24. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
25. Are customers identified and high impact areas defined?
<--- Score
26. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?
<--- Score
27. What Self-service services do you require?
<--- Score
28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?
<--- Score
29. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
30. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
31. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
32. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
33. How did the Self-service manager receive input to the development of a Self-service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
34. Is special Self-service user knowledge required?
<--- Score
35. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
36. How often are the team meetings?
<--- Score
37. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
38. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Self-service?
<--- Score
39. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
40. Are there any self-service requirements?
<--- Score
41. Do you track how self-service uptake is changing the type, duration and skills requirements in the live assistance channel?
<--- Score
42. Who are the Self-service improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
43. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Self-service goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
44. Are improvement team members fully trained on Self-service?
<--- Score
45. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
46. Are team charters developed?
<--- Score
47. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
48. Have the customer needs been translated into