Theory Of Governance A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

best in class?

      <--- Score

      17. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      18. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      19. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      20. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      21. Is there any additional Theory of governance definition of success?

      <--- Score

      22. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      23. How will the Theory of governance team and the group measure complete success of Theory of governance?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      25. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      26. Are the Theory of governance requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      27. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      28. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      29. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Theory of governance results are met?

      <--- Score

      30. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      31. Is the Theory of governance scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      32. What is the scope of the Theory of governance effort?

      <--- Score

      33. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Theory of governance? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      34. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      35. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      36. How do you manage unclear Theory of governance requirements?

      <--- Score

      37. What would be the goal or target for a Theory of governance’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      38. How can the value of Theory of governance be defined?

      <--- Score

      39. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      40. Why are you doing Theory of governance and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      41. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      42. How do you gather Theory of governance requirements?

      <--- Score

      43. Is there a critical path to deliver Theory of governance results?

      <--- Score

      44. How would you define Theory of governance leadership?

      <--- Score

      45. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      46. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      47. Is the Theory of governance scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      48. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Theory of governance work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      49. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      50. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Theory of governance brings?

      <--- Score

      51. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      52. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      54. How do you think the partners involved in Theory of governance would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      55. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Theory of governance?

      <--- Score

      56. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      57. Is Theory of governance linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      58. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      59. Who approved the Theory of governance scope?

      <--- Score

      60. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      61. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      62. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      63. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      64. What sources do you use to gather information for a Theory of governance study?

      <--- Score

      65. How does the Theory of governance manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      66. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      67. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      68. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      70. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      71. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      72. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?