Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      107. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      108. How would you define Scientific workflow management system leadership?

      <--- Score

      109. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      110. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Scientific workflow management system changes?

      <--- Score

      111. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      112. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      113. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      114. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the Scientific workflow management system scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      116. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      117. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      118. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      119. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      120. How do you hand over Scientific workflow management system context?

      <--- Score

      121. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      122. What system do you use for gathering Scientific workflow management system information?

      <--- Score

      123. Is special Scientific workflow management system user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      124. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      125. Has a Scientific workflow management system requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      126. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Scientific workflow management system brings?

      <--- Score

      127. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Scientific workflow management system leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      128. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      129. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      130. Why are you doing Scientific workflow management system and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      131. What is the definition of Scientific workflow management system excellence?

      <--- Score

      132. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      133. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      134. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      135. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      136. What Scientific workflow management system requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      137. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      138. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      139. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      140. Is there any additional Scientific workflow management system definition of success?

      <--- Score

      141. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Scientific workflow management system Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. What are the estimated costs of proposed changes?

      <--- Score

      2. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      3. How do you quantify and qualify impacts?

      <--- Score

      4. What disadvantage does this cause for the user?

      <--- Score

      5. How is the value delivered by Scientific workflow management system being measured?

      <--- Score

      6. How sensitive must the Scientific workflow management system strategy be to cost?

      <--- Score

      7. Will Scientific workflow management system have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

      <--- Score

      8. What does your operating model cost?

      <--- Score

      9. What does losing customers cost your organization?

      <--- Score

      10. How do you verify and validate the Scientific workflow management system data?

      <--- Score

      11. How will costs be allocated?

      <--- Score

      12. What are the types and number of measures to use?

      <--- Score

      13. What do people want to verify?

      <--- Score

      14.