Scientific Workflow Management System A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      2. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      3. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      4. When is/was the Scientific workflow management system start date?

      <--- Score

      5. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      6. Is there a critical path to deliver Scientific workflow management system results?

      <--- Score

      7. Has the Scientific workflow management system work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      8. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      9. Is Scientific workflow management system required?

      <--- Score

      10. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      11. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      12. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Scientific workflow management system work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      13. Are accountability and ownership for Scientific workflow management system clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      14. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      15. How are consistent Scientific workflow management system definitions important?

      <--- Score

      16. Is there a Scientific workflow management system management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      17. How can the value of Scientific workflow management system be defined?

      <--- Score

      18. How do you manage unclear Scientific workflow management system requirements?

      <--- Score

      19. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      20. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      21. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      22. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      23. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      25. Are the Scientific workflow management system requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      26. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      27. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      28. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      29. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      30. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      31. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      32. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      33. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      34. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      35. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      36. What sources do you use to gather information for a Scientific workflow management system study?

      <--- Score

      37. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      38. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Scientific workflow management system goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      39. Is Scientific workflow management system currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      40. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      41. How does the Scientific workflow management system manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      42. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Scientific workflow management system results are met?

      <--- Score

      43. Will team members perform Scientific workflow management system work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      44. Are improvement team members fully trained on Scientific workflow management system?

      <--- Score

      45. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      46. Who approved the Scientific workflow management system scope?

      <--- Score

      47. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      48. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      49. How do you think the partners involved in Scientific workflow management system would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      50. What are (control) requirements for Scientific workflow management system Information?

      <--- Score

      51. What gets