Название | Information Logistics A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Gerardus Blokdyk |
Жанр | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Серия | |
Издательство | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781867461470 |
<--- Score
68. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?
<--- Score
69. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
70. Is special Information logistics user knowledge required?
<--- Score
71. What are the tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
72. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
73. Who are the Information logistics improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
74. What are the Information logistics use cases?
<--- Score
75. Who approved the Information logistics scope?
<--- Score
76. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
77. Is the scope of Information logistics defined?
<--- Score
78. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
79. Are the Information logistics requirements complete?
<--- Score
80. What are (control) requirements for Information logistics Information?
<--- Score
81. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
82. What sort of initial information to gather?
<--- Score
83. Have all basic functions of Information logistics been defined?
<--- Score
84. How did the Information logistics manager receive input to the development of a Information logistics improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
85. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
86. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
87. Is there a critical path to deliver Information logistics results?
<--- Score
88. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
89. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
90. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
91. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?
<--- Score
92. What is the definition of Information logistics excellence?
<--- Score
93. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
94. Is Information logistics required?
<--- Score
95. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?
<--- Score
96. Is the Information logistics scope complete and appropriately sized?
<--- Score
97. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Information logistics goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
98. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
99. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
100. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
101. What sources do you use to gather information for a Information logistics study?
<--- Score
102. Is the Information logistics scope manageable?
<--- Score
103. Will team members regularly document their Information logistics work?
<--- Score
104. What is the scope of Information logistics?
<--- Score
105. What is in scope?
<--- Score
106. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Information logistics leverage and how?
<--- Score
107. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
108. Are stakeholder processes mapped?
<--- Score
109. Is Information logistics linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
110. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Information logistics results are met?
<--- Score
111. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
112. Do you all define Information logistics in the same way?
<--- Score
113. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Information logistics work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
114. How do you hand over Information logistics context?
<--- Score
115. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Information logistics? If so, when did it change and why?
<--- Score
116. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
117. What are the record-keeping requirements of Information logistics activities?
<--- Score
118. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?
<--- Score
119. Are all requirements met?
<--- Score
120. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
121. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
122.