Risk Assessments A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

      <--- Score

      30. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      31. Is the Risk assessments scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      32. Has the Risk assessments work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      33. Are the Risk assessments requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      34. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      35. Is special Risk assessments user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      36. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      37. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      38. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      39. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      40. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      41. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      42. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Risk assessments brings?

      <--- Score

      43. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      44. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Risk assessments results are met?

      <--- Score

      45. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      46. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      47. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      48. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      49. What sources do you use to gather information for a Risk assessments study?

      <--- Score

      50. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      51. How are consistent Risk assessments definitions important?

      <--- Score

      52. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Risk assessments goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      53. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      54. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Risk assessments leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      55. How do you catch Risk assessments definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      56. Is there a critical path to deliver Risk assessments results?

      <--- Score

      57. How did the Risk assessments manager receive input to the development of a Risk assessments improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      58. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      59. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      60. How do you manage unclear Risk assessments requirements?

      <--- Score

      61. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      62. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      63. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      64. How do you gather Risk assessments requirements?

      <--- Score

      65. Will team members regularly document their Risk assessments work?

      <--- Score

      66. How will the Risk assessments team and the group measure complete success of Risk assessments?

      <--- Score

      67. What is the scope of the Risk assessments effort?

      <--- Score

      68. Are employees required to attend information security awareness training?

      <--- Score

      69. Will team members perform Risk assessments work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      70. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      71. Is a fully trained team formed, supported, and committed to work on the Risk assessments improvements?

      <--- Score

      72. Are systems required to block system access after a pre-determine number of unsuccessful logon attempts?

      <--- Score

      73. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      74. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      75. Is there a Risk assessments management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      76. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      77. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      78. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      79. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      80. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      81. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      82. What would be the goal or target for a Risk assessments’s