Compensation And Benefits Review A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

been defined?

      <--- Score

      60. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      61. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      62. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      63. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      64. What are the Compensation and Benefits Review use cases?

      <--- Score

      65. Have all basic functions of Compensation and Benefits Review been defined?

      <--- Score

      66. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      67. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      68. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Compensation and Benefits Review changes?

      <--- Score

      69. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      70. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      71. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      72. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      73. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      74. What sources do you use to gather information for a Compensation and Benefits Review study?

      <--- Score

      75. What are the core elements of the Compensation and Benefits Review business case?

      <--- Score

      76. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      77. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      78. How have you defined all Compensation and Benefits Review requirements first?

      <--- Score

      79. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      80. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      81. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      82. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      83. How will the Compensation and Benefits Review team and the group measure complete success of Compensation and Benefits Review?

      <--- Score

      84. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Compensation and Benefits Review? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      85. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      86. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      87. Is there any additional Compensation and Benefits Review definition of success?

      <--- Score

      88. What is the scope of the Compensation and Benefits Review work?

      <--- Score

      89. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      90. Is Compensation and Benefits Review linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      91. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      92. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      93. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Compensation and Benefits Review leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      94. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      95. What is the scope of Compensation and Benefits Review?

      <--- Score

      96. How did the Compensation and Benefits Review manager receive input to the development of a Compensation and Benefits Review improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      97. What are the record-keeping requirements of Compensation and Benefits Review activities?

      <--- Score

      98. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Compensation and Benefits Review brings?

      <--- Score

      99. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      100. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      101. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      102. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Compensation and Benefits Review?

      <--- Score

      103. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      104. What Compensation and Benefits Review requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      105. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      106. Is the Compensation and Benefits Review scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      107. When is/was the Compensation and Benefits Review start date?

      <--- Score

      108. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      109. Is the scope of Compensation and Benefits Review defined?

      <--- Score

      110. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      111. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      112. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      113. Has the Compensation and Benefits Review work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <---