Emergency Communication Systems A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      2. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      3. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      4. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      5. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      6. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      7. When is/was the Emergency communication systems start date?

      <--- Score

      8. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      9. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      10. What are (control) requirements for Emergency communication systems Information?

      <--- Score

      11. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      12. How will the Emergency communication systems team and the group measure complete success of Emergency communication systems?

      <--- Score

      13. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      14. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      15. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      16. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      17. What is the scope of the Emergency communication systems work?

      <--- Score

      18. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Emergency communication systems goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      19. Are stakeholder processes mapped?

      <--- Score

      20. Who approved the Emergency communication systems scope?

      <--- Score

      21. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      22. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      23. Is Emergency communication systems linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      24. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      25. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      26. What Emergency communication systems services do you require?

      <--- Score

      27. How have you defined all Emergency communication systems requirements first?

      <--- Score

      28. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      29. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      30. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      31. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      32. What are the Emergency communication systems tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you catch Emergency communication systems definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      34. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      35. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      36. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      37. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      38. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      39. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      40. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Emergency communication systems results are met?

      <--- Score

      41. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      42. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      43. How do you hand over Emergency communication systems context?

      <--- Score

      44. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Emergency communication systems changes?

      <--- Score

      45. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      46. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      47. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      48. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      49. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      50. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Emergency communication systems work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      51. Are the Emergency communication systems requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      52.