Power System Simulation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      119. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      120. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      121. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      122. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      123. How do you gather Power system simulation requirements?

      <--- Score

      124. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      125. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Power system simulation changes?

      <--- Score

      126. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      127. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      128. What happens if Power system simulation’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      129. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      130. What is the definition of Power system simulation excellence?

      <--- Score

      131. Has a Power system simulation requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      132. Is there any additional Power system simulation definition of success?

      <--- Score

      133. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      134. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      135. Are the Power system simulation requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      136. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      137. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Power system simulation work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      138. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      139. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Power system simulation? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      140. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      141. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Power system simulation?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Power system simulation Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. Have design-to-cost goals been established?

      <--- Score

      2. When should you bother with diagrams?

      <--- Score

      3. How frequently do you track Power system simulation measures?

      <--- Score

      4. Do you effectively measure and reward individual and team performance?

      <--- Score

      5. What are your operating costs?

      <--- Score

      6. How do you aggregate measures across priorities?

      <--- Score

      7. Where is it measured?

      <--- Score

      8. How do you verify and validate the Power system simulation data?

      <--- Score

      9. What are the costs of delaying Power system simulation action?

      <--- Score

      10. Do you aggressively reward and promote the people who have the biggest impact on creating excellent Power system simulation services/products?

      <--- Score

      11. What causes innovation to fail or succeed in your organization?

      <--- Score

      12. How can you manage cost down?

      <--- Score

      13. How do you verify performance?

      <--- Score

      14. What could cause delays in the schedule?

      <--- Score

      15. How will you measure success?

      <--- Score

      16. What causes mismanagement?

      <--- Score

      17. What measurements are possible, practicable and meaningful?

      <--- Score

      18. How do you control the overall costs of your work processes?

      <--- Score

      19. How frequently do you verify your Power system simulation strategy?

      <--- Score

      20. How much does it cost?

      <--- Score

      21. Are the Power system simulation benefits worth its costs?

      <--- Score

      22. What are you verifying?

      <--- Score

      23. What are the Power system simulation key cost drivers?

      <--- Score

      24. How do you verify your resources?

      <--- Score

      25. Will Power system simulation have an impact on current business continuity, disaster recovery processes and/or infrastructure?

      <--- Score

      26. Are missed Power system simulation opportunities costing your organization money?

      <--- Score

      27. Is the solution cost-effective?

      <--- Score

      28. Are actual costs in line with budgeted costs?

      <--- Score

      29. How are measurements made?

      <--- Score

      30.