Power System Simulation A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      9. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      10. How do you think the partners involved in Power system simulation would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      11. What is the scope of the Power system simulation effort?

      <--- Score

      12. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      13. What is in scope?

      <--- Score

      14. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      15. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      16. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      17. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      18. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      19. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      20. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      21. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      22. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      23. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Power system simulation goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      24. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      25. Is the team sponsored by a champion or stakeholder leader?

      <--- Score

      26. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Power system simulation brings?

      <--- Score

      27. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      28. Are accountability and ownership for Power system simulation clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      29. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      30. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      31. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      32. How do you hand over Power system simulation context?

      <--- Score

      33. Will a Power system simulation production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      34. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      35. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      36. Why are you doing Power system simulation and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      37. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      38. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      39. Will team members perform Power system simulation work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      40. How would you define Power system simulation leadership?

      <--- Score

      41. How does the Power system simulation manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      42. Is the Power system simulation scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      43. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Power system simulation leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      44. Are the Power system simulation requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      45. How can the value of Power system simulation be defined?

      <--- Score

      46. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      47. How have you defined all Power system simulation requirements first?

      <--- Score

      48. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      49. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      50. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      51. Have all basic functions of Power system simulation been defined?

      <--- Score

      52. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      53. What system do you use for gathering Power system simulation information?

      <--- Score

      54. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?

      <--- Score

      55. How are consistent Power system simulation definitions important?

      <--- Score

      56. Is special Power system simulation user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      57. In what way can you redefine the criteria of choice clients have in your category in your favor?

      <--- Score

      58. Do you have a Power system simulation success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      59. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      60. Is the Power system simulation scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      61. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      62. Does the