Infrastructure As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Score

      64. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Infrastructure-as-a-service leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      65. Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      66. Is Infrastructure-as-a-service linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      67. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Infrastructure-as-a-service? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      68. What are (control) requirements for Infrastructure-as-a-service Information?

      <--- Score

      69. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      70. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.

      <--- Score

      71. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      72. How do you catch Infrastructure-as-a-service definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      73. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      74. What Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      75. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      76. How do you manage unclear Infrastructure-as-a-service requirements?

      <--- Score

      77. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      78. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      79. When is the estimated completion date?

      <--- Score

      80. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      81. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      82. Is Infrastructure-as-a-service currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      83. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      84. What are the record-keeping requirements of Infrastructure-as-a-service activities?

      <--- Score

      85. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      86. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      87. Is there a Infrastructure-as-a-service management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      88. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      89. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Infrastructure-as-a-service results are met?

      <--- Score

      90. What happens if Infrastructure-as-a-service’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      91. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      92. How can the value of Infrastructure-as-a-service be defined?

      <--- Score

      93. Are accountability and ownership for Infrastructure-as-a-service clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      94. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      95. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      96. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      97. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      98. Will team members regularly document their Infrastructure-as-a-service work?

      <--- Score

      99. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      100. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      101. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      102. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      103. Has a Infrastructure-as-a-service requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      104. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      105. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      106. Will a Infrastructure-as-a-service production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      107. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      108. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      109. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      110. How did the Infrastructure-as-a-service manager receive input to the development of a Infrastructure-as-a-service improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      111. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      112. Who is gathering Infrastructure-as-a-service information?

      <--- Score

      113. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      114. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the Infrastructure-as-a-service scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      116. Are team charters developed?

      <--- Score

      117. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      118. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed