Название | Infrastructure As A Service A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Gerardus Blokdyk |
Жанр | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Серия | |
Издательство | Зарубежная деловая литература |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781867459422 |
<--- Score
53. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
54. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?
<--- Score
55. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?
<--- Score
56. What is the Infrastructure-as-a-service problem definition? What do you need to resolve?
<--- Score
57. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
58. Why the need?
<--- Score
59. How do you recognize an Infrastructure-as-a-service objection?
<--- Score
60. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
61. What are the expected benefits of Infrastructure-as-a-service to the stakeholder?
<--- Score
62. Are your goals realistic? Do you need to redefine your problem? Perhaps the problem has changed or maybe you have reached your goal and need to set a new one?
<--- Score
63. What information do users need?
<--- Score
64. As a sponsor, customer or management, how important is it to meet goals, objectives?
<--- Score
65. Whom do you really need or want to serve?
<--- Score
66. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
67. To what extent would your organization benefit from being recognized as a award recipient?
<--- Score
68. What Infrastructure-as-a-service capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
69. What problems are you facing and how do you consider Infrastructure-as-a-service will circumvent those obstacles?
<--- Score
70. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Infrastructure-as-a-service team, Infrastructure-as-a-service itself?
<--- Score
71. How do you recognize an objection?
<--- Score
72. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
73. How can auditing be a preventative security measure?
<--- Score
74. What vendors make products that address the Infrastructure-as-a-service needs?
<--- Score
75. To what extent does each concerned units management team recognize Infrastructure-as-a-service as an effective investment?
<--- Score
76. Are controls defined to recognize and contain problems?
<--- Score
77. Who needs to know?
<--- Score
78. Will it solve real problems?
<--- Score
79. Do you have/need 24-hour access to key personnel?
<--- Score
80. Why is this needed?
<--- Score
81. Do you recognize Infrastructure-as-a-service achievements?
<--- Score
82. What do you need to start doing?
<--- Score
83. How are you going to measure success?
<--- Score
84. What would happen if Infrastructure-as-a-service weren’t done?
<--- Score
85. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
86. Is the need for organizational change recognized?
<--- Score
87. Will Infrastructure-as-a-service deliverables need to be tested and, if so, by whom?
<--- Score
88. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
89. What is the problem or issue?
<--- Score
90. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?
<--- Score
91. Are there recognized Infrastructure-as-a-service problems?
<--- Score
92. What does Infrastructure-as-a-service success mean to the stakeholders?
<--- Score
93. What are your needs in relation to Infrastructure-as-a-service skills, labor, equipment, and markets?
<--- Score
94. When a Infrastructure-as-a-service manager recognizes a problem, what options are available?
<--- Score
95. Are losses recognized in a timely manner?
<--- Score
96. Does the problem have ethical dimensions?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Infrastructure-as-a-service Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
2. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
3. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
4. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?
<--- Score
5. Has your scope been defined?
<--- Score
6. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
7. What is in scope?
<---