Microsoft Ignite A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

What are the Microsoft Ignite tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      72. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Microsoft Ignite?

      <--- Score

      73. Will a Microsoft Ignite production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      74. What is the scope of Microsoft Ignite?

      <--- Score

      75. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      76. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Microsoft Ignite results are met?

      <--- Score

      77. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      78. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      79. What is the context?

      <--- Score

      80. What Microsoft Ignite requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      81. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      82. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      83. Are the Microsoft Ignite requirements testable?

      <--- Score

      84. Are accountability and ownership for Microsoft Ignite clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      85. Is the Microsoft Ignite scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      86. How do you gather Microsoft Ignite requirements?

      <--- Score

      87. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      88. How would you define Microsoft Ignite leadership?

      <--- Score

      89. Have all basic functions of Microsoft Ignite been defined?

      <--- Score

      90. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      91. Who is gathering Microsoft Ignite information?

      <--- Score

      92. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      93. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      94. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?

      <--- Score

      95. Who approved the Microsoft Ignite scope?

      <--- Score

      96. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      97. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      98. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      99. Is there a critical path to deliver Microsoft Ignite results?

      <--- Score

      100. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Microsoft Ignite leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      101. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      102. Is Microsoft Ignite linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?

      <--- Score

      103. Is the scope of Microsoft Ignite defined?

      <--- Score

      104. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      105. Will team members perform Microsoft Ignite work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      106. Scope of sensitive information?

      <--- Score

      107. Is there a clear Microsoft Ignite case definition?

      <--- Score

      108. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      109. How does the Microsoft Ignite manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      110. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      111. What sources do you use to gather information for a Microsoft Ignite study?

      <--- Score

      112. Is the work to date meeting requirements?

      <--- Score

      113. Is special Microsoft Ignite user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      114. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      115. Is full participation by members in regularly held team meetings guaranteed?

      <--- Score

      116. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      117. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Microsoft Ignite? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      118. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      119. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      120. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      121. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      122. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Microsoft Ignite changes?

      <--- Score

      123. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      124. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      125. Is there any additional Microsoft Ignite definition of success?

      <--- Score

      126. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      127. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      128. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score