Microsoft Ignite A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

this?

      <--- Score

      62. Is the need for organizational change recognized?

      <--- Score

      63. Do you need to update on-premise Exchange or Active Directory services before migrating?

      <--- Score

      64. For your Microsoft Ignite project, identify and describe the business environment, is there more than one layer to the business environment?

      <--- Score

      65. Consider your own Microsoft Ignite project, what types of organizational problems do you think might be causing or affecting your problem, based on the work done so far?

      <--- Score

      66. Who should resolve the Microsoft Ignite issues?

      <--- Score

      67. What is the problem or issue?

      <--- Score

      68. What are the timeframes required to resolve each of the issues/problems?

      <--- Score

      69. Is the quality assurance team identified?

      <--- Score

      70. Think about the people you identified for your Microsoft Ignite project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?

      <--- Score

      71. Will new equipment/products be required to facilitate Microsoft Ignite delivery, for example is new software needed?

      <--- Score

      72. What do you need to start doing?

      <--- Score

      73. What are your needs in relation to Microsoft Ignite skills, labor, equipment, and markets?

      <--- Score

      74. Is it needed?

      <--- Score

      75. What does Microsoft Ignite success mean to the stakeholders?

      <--- Score

      76. Would you recognize a threat from the inside?

      <--- Score

      77. What are the clients issues and concerns?

      <--- Score

      78. How are the Microsoft Ignite’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?

      <--- Score

      79. What are the expected benefits of Microsoft Ignite to the stakeholder?

      <--- Score

      80. What training and capacity building actions are needed to implement proposed reforms?

      <--- Score

      81. Will a response program recognize when a crisis occurs and provide some level of response?

      <--- Score

      82. Who defines the rules in relation to any given issue?

      <--- Score

      83. What vendors make products that address the Microsoft Ignite needs?

      <--- Score

      84. What are the minority interests and what amount of minority interests can be recognized?

      <--- Score

      85. How do you recognize an Microsoft Ignite objection?

      <--- Score

      86. Do you need different information or graphics?

      <--- Score

      87. How do you recognize an objection?

      <--- Score

      88. Where is training needed?

      <--- Score

      89. What resources or support might you need?

      <--- Score

      90. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?

      <--- Score

      91. How do you take a forward-looking perspective in identifying Microsoft Ignite research related to market response and models?

      <--- Score

      92. How do you assess your Microsoft Ignite workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?

      <--- Score

      93. How are training requirements identified?

      <--- Score

      94. How many trainings, in total, are needed?

      <--- Score

      95. What Microsoft Ignite events should you attend?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Microsoft Ignite Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #2: DEFINE:

      INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

      1. How did the Microsoft Ignite manager receive input to the development of a Microsoft Ignite improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      2. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      3. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      4. What are the Microsoft Ignite use cases?

      <--- Score

      5. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      6. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      7. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      8. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      9. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      10. Do you have a Microsoft Ignite success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      11. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      12. Why are you doing Microsoft Ignite and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      13. What is the scope of the Microsoft Ignite effort?

      <--- Score

      14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <---