Название | Animal Behavior for Shelter Veterinarians and Staff |
---|---|
Автор произведения | Группа авторов |
Жанр | Биология |
Серия | |
Издательство | Биология |
Год выпуска | 0 |
isbn | 9781119618508 |
31 Rauktis, M.E., Rose, L., Chen, Q. et al. (2017). “Their pets are loved members of their family”: Animal ownership, food insecurity, and the value of having pet food available in food banks. Anthrozoös 30 (4): 581–593.
32 Russo, A., Dowling‐Guyer, S., and McCobb, E. (2021) Community programming for companion dog retention: A survey of animal welfare organizations. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2020.1869551
33 Salman, M.D., Hutchison, J., Ruch‐Gallie, R., et al. (2000). Behavioral reasons for relinquishment of dogs and cats to 12 shelters. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0302_2.
34 Samuels, W.E., Meers, L.L., and Normando, S. (2016). Improving upper elementary students’ humane attitudes and prosocial behaviors through an in‐class humane education program. Anthrozoös 29 (4): 597–610.
35 Scarlett, J.M., Greenberg, M., and Hoshizaki, T. (2017). Every Nose Counts: Using Metrics in Animal Shelters. Middletown, DE: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
36 Scarlett, J. and Johnston, N. (2012). Impact of a subsidized spay neuter clinic on impoundments and euthanasia in a community shelter and on service and complaint calls to animal control. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 15 (1): 53–69.
37 Schurer, J.M., Phipps, K., Okemow, C. et al. (2015). Stabilizing dog populations and improving animal and public health through a participatory approach in indigenous communities. Zoonoses Public Health 62 (6): 445–455.
38 Shelter Animals Count. (n.d.) Dashboards. https://www.shelteranimalscount.org/data‐dashboards (accessed 2 December 2021).
39 Shore, E.R., Burdsal, C., and Douglas, D.K. (2008). Pet owners' views of pet behavior problems and willingness to consult experts for assistance. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 11 (1): 63–73.
40 Tardif‐Williams, C.Y. and Bosacki, S.L. (2015). Evaluating the impact of a humane education summer‐camp program on school‐aged children's relationships with companion animals. Anthrozoös 28 (4): 587–600.
41 Taylor, N., Riggs, D.W., Donovan, C. et al. (2019). People of diverse genders and/or sexualities caring for and protecting animal companions in the context of domestic violence. Violence Against Women 25 (9): 1096–1115.
42 Weiss, E. (2015). Safety nets and support for pets at risk of entering the sheltering system. In: Animal Behavior for Shelter Veterinarians and Staff (eds. E. Weiss, H. Mohan‐Gibbons, and S. Zawistowski), 286–291. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
43 Weiss, E., Gramann, S., Spain, C.V. et al. (2015). Goodbye to a good friend: An exploration of the re‐homing of cats and dogs in the US. Open J. Anim. Sci. 5 (4): 435–456.
44 Weiss, E., Slater, M., Garrison, L. et al. (2014). Large dog relinquishment to two municipal facilities in New York City and Washington, DC: Identifying targets for intervention. Animals 4 (3): 409–433.
45 Weiss, E., Slater, M.R., and Lord, L.K. (2011). Retention of provided identification for dogs and cats seen in veterinary clinics and adopted from shelters in Oklahoma City, OK, USA. Prev. Vet. Med. 101 (3–4): 265–269.
46 Wells, D.L. (2019). The state of research on human–animal relations: Implications for human health. Anthrozoös 32 (2): 169–181.
47 White, S.C., Jefferson, E., and Levy, J.K. (2010). Impact of publicly sponsored neutering programs on animal population dynamics at animal shelters: The New Hampshire and Austin experiences. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 13 (3): 191–212.
48 White, S.C., Scarlett, J.M., and Levy, J.K. (2018). Characteristics of clients and animals served by high‐volume, stationary, nonprofit spay‐neuter clinics. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 253 (6): 737–745.
Appendix 5.A Overview of Safety Net Program Types
Category | Program type | Benefits/Impact* | Resources needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
To the pet | To the owner | To the community | To the organization | |||
Basic needs | Food banks | Address basic nutritional needs | Reduce food insecurity | Collaborative programs offer a One Health approach to meeting basic needs | Opportunity for collaboration with key community stakeholders | Minimal investment in time and resources, particularly if donated food is used |
Pet‐friendly housing support | Addresses basic sheltering needs | Reduces housing insecurity | Collaborative programs create partnership with attorneys, human social services, and housing organizations | Opportunity for collaboration with key community stakeholders | Minimal resources to develop and maintain a database; more resources needed for advocacy | |
Rehoming advice and resources | Avoid sheltering | Ideally ease the rehoming process and enhance communication with the new owner | Facilitate community member connections to address the need for rehoming | Place the onus for rehoming on the pet owner when feasible | Minimal | |
Lost‐and‐found programs | Avoid the negative sequelae of roaming at‐large | Reduce/prevent the emotional impact of losing a pet | Reduce the nuisance or dangerous behaviors related to stray pets | Often required for municipal organizations; touchpoint with the community to provide access to other services | Moderate to significant use of time but often within normal scope of responsibilities | |
Temporary sheltering | Prevents permanent rehoming | Maintains the human‐animal bond at a time of critical need | Removes a barrier for those in crisis to seek help for themselves | Opportunity for collaboration through programs that are often very well received by the organization’s supporters | Moderate investment in time and resources to manage program and provide care | |
Humane education | Potential for improved welfare | Increases knowledge regarding pet care and may improve children’s emotional well‐being | May enhance empathy and correlate with other positive behaviors in children | Strengthens ties to the community; provides potential for revenue through classes, parties, and camps | Variable based on the scope of the program | |
Veterinary care | Spay‐neuter services | Health benefits of sterilization |
Avoidance of unwanted litters and problematic pet behaviors associated with a
|