Chemical Analysis. Francis Rouessac

      Real chromatographic peaks often deviate significantly from the ideal Gaussian form. There are several reasons for this. In particular, the peak’s half‐width at the inflection point is not only due to elution in the column but also to injection and detection, which we summarize with the following expression:

      (1.3)

      where σ ² _tot, σ ² _inj, σ ² _col, σ ² _det are, respectively, the total variance (as observed experimentally), the variance due to injection (injection time, time for the sample to penetrate into the column), the variance due to the column (elution), and the variance due to detection (dead volume between column outlet and detector, detector response time, etc.).

1.4 PLATE THEORY

      For more than half a century, different theories have been and continue to be proposed to model chromatography. The best known are those employing a statistical approach (stochastic theory), the theoretical plate model or a molecular dynamics approach.

To explain the mechanism of migration and separation of compounds on the column, the oldest model, known as Craig’s theoretical plate model, is a static approach now judged to be obsolete, but which once offered a simple description of the separation of constituents.

      Although chromatography is a continuous phenomenon, Craig’s model considered that each solute moves progressively along a sequence of distinct static steps. This elementary process is represented by a cycle of adsorption/desorption. The continuity of these steps reproduces the migration of the compounds on the column, in a similar fashion to that achieved by an animated film, giving the illusion of movement through a sequence of fixed images. Each step corresponds to a new state of equilibrium for the entire column.

      These successive equilibria provide the basis of plate theory according to which a column of length L is sliced horizontally into N fictitious, small plate‐like discs of the same height H and numbered from 1 to n. For each of them, the concentration of the solute in the mobile phase is in equilibrium with the concentration of this solute in the stationary phase. At each new equilibrium, the solute has progressed through the column by a distance of one disc (or plate), hence the name theoretical plate theory.

      The height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP or H) will be given by:

(1.4)

      This approach employs the rules of polynomial expansion to calculate, for a given plate, the masses distributed between the two phases present. This theory has a major fault in that it does not take into account the dispersion in the column due to the diffusion of the compounds.

      The term theoretical plate comes from an early approach to describe chromatography by analogy with the distillation model proposed by Martin and Synge (Nobel laureates in Chemistry, 1952). This term, though widely used in chromatography for historical reasons, has no physical significance, in contrast to its homonym which serves to measure the performance of a distillation column. It may have been better to name it after Tswett, for example!

      The total retention time t_R of the solute on the column can be subdivided into two terms: t_M (hold‐up time), which includes the times during which the solute is dissolved in the mobile phase and travels at the same speed as this phase, and t_S, the time during which it is attached to the stationary phase. Between two successive transfers from one phase to the other, it is accepted that the concentrations have the time to re‐equilibrate.

      Chromatography involves at least three sets of equilibria: solute/mobile phase, solute/stationary phase, and mobile phase/stationary phase. In a more recent theory of chromatography, it is no longer claimed that the molecules are immobilized by the stationary phase, but rather that they are simply slowed down when passing in close proximity to it.

Various physical phenomena may reveal an asymmetry in the chromatographic peak. More specifically, there is a concentration irregularity in the substance deposit zone at the column head. Moreover, the speed of the mobile phase is null on the wall and at a maximum in the centre of the column. The observed asymmetry of a peak is represented by two parameters: one named the peak asymmetry factor (F_a) (Eq. (1.5)), measured at 10% of the peak height, and the other named tailing factor (F_t) (Eq. (1.6)) measured at 5% of peak height (for the meaning of a and b in these equations, see Figure 1.5).

(1.5)

(1.6)

Figure 1.5 Distribution isotherms. (a) The ideal situation corresponding to the invariance of the concentration isotherm. (b) Situation in which the stationary phase is saturated – as a result, the ascent of the peak is faster than the descent. (c) The opposite situation: the component is retained too long by the stationary phase, the retention time is therefore extended, and the ascent of the peak is slower than the descent. For each type of column, the manufacturers indicate its capacity limit, expressed in ng/compound, prior to a potential deformation of the corresponding peak. The three situations are illustrated by authentic chromatograms.

1.5 NERNST PARTITION COEFFICIENT (K)

      The fundamental physico‐chemical parameter of chromatography is the equilibrium constant K, termed the partition coefficient, quantifying the ratio of the concentrations of each compound in the two phases.

      (1.7)

      Values of K are quite variable. The higher they are, the more solute is retained. At least for liquid chromatography, they depend on the intensity of three types of interactions: stationary phase/solute, mobile phase/solute, and mobile phase/stationary phase.

      Like any equilibrium constant, it is a function of temperature. It is related to variations in free enthalpy, standard enthalpy, and entropy of the exchange reaction by means of the following relationships:

      (1.8)

Скачать книгу