River Restoration. Группа авторов

C.A., Magilligan, F.J., and Sneddon, C.S. (2016). “You kill the dam, you are killing a part of me”: dam removal and the environmental politics of river restoration. Geoforum 70: 93–104.

      75 Fox, C.A., Reo, N.J., Turner, D.A., et al. (2017). “The river is us; the river is in our veins”: re‐defining river restoration in three Indigenous communities. Sustainability Science 12(4): 521–533.

      76 Francis, R.A. (2014). Urban rivers: novel ecosystems, new challenges. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 1(1): 19–29.

      77 Gallie, W.B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: New Series 56: 167–198.

      78 Garcia, X., Corominas, L., Pargament, D., et al. (2016). Is river rehabilitation economically viable in water‐scarce basins? Environmental Science & Policy 61: 154–164.

      79 Gerlak, A.K., Eden, S., Megdal, S., et al. (2009). Restoration and river management in the arid Southwestern USA: exploring project design trends and features. Water Policy 11(4): 461–480.

      80 Gerner, N.V., Nafo, I., Winking, C., et al. (2018). Large‐scale river restoration pays off: a case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosystem Services 30: 327–338.

      81 Gideon, L. (2012). Handbook of Survey Methodology for the Social Sciences. New York: Springer.

      82 Gifford, R. and Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. In: The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (ed. S.D. Clayton). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      83 Gobster, P.H. and Hull, R.B. (eds) (2000). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Washington DC: Island Press.

      84 Gobster, P.H., Nassauer, J.I., Daniel, T.C., et al. (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22(7): 959–972.

      85 Golet, G.H., Roberts, M.D., Larsen, E.W., et al. (2006). Assessing societal impacts when planning restoration of large alluvial rivers: a case study of the Sacramento River project, California. Environmental Management 37(6): 862–879.

      86 Gómez, C.M., Pérez‐Blanco, C.D., and Batalla, R.J. (2014). Tradeoffs in river restoration: flushing flows vs. hydropower generation in the Lower Ebro River, Spain. Journal of Hydrology 518: 130–139.

      87 Gore, J.A. (1985). Restoration of Rivers and Streams. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann.

      88 Grizzetti, B., Pistocchi, A., Liquete, C., et al. (2017). Human pressures and ecological status of European rivers. Scientific Reports 7: 205.

      89 Grossmann, M. (2012). Economic value of the nutrient retention function of restored floodplain wetlands in the Elbe River basin. Ecological Economics 83: 108–117.

      90 Guerrin, J. (2015). A floodplain restoration project on the River Rhône (France): analyzing challenges to its implementation. Regional Environmental Change 15(3): 559–568.

      91 Haines‐Young, R. and Potschin, M. (2010). The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well‐being. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis 1: 110–139.

      92 Hannigan, J. (2006). Environmental Sociology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

      93 Haque, A.K.E., Faisal, I., and Bayes, A. (1997). Welfare costs of environmental pollution from the tanning industry in Dhaka: an EIA study. Paper presented at the Mid‐term Review Workshop in Yogyakarta, Indonesia (3–8 September 1997).

      94 Hausman, D.M. (2011). Preference, Value, Choice, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      95 Heise, U.K., Christensen, J., and Niemann, M. (eds) (2017). The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.

      96 Heldt, S., Budryte, P., Ingensiep, H.W., et al. (2016). Social pitfalls for river restoration: how public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance. Environmental Earth Sciences 75(13): 1053.

      97 Hidalgo, M.C. and Hernández, B. (2001). Place attachment: conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(3): 273–281.

      98 Hill, M.R., McMaster, D.G., Harrison, T., et al. (2011). A reverse auction for wetland restoration in the Assiniboine River Watershed, Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(2): 245–258.

      99 Holmes, N.T. and Nielsen, M.B. (1998). Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: a joint Danish and British EU‐LIFE demonstration project, I: setting up and delivery of the project. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8(1): 185–196.

      100 Honey‐Rosés, J., Acuña, V., Bardina, M., et al. (2013). Examining the demand for ecosystem services: the value of stream restoration for drinking water treatment managers in the Llobregat river, Spain. Ecological Economics 90: 196–205.

      101 Hong, C. and Chun, H. (2018). Barriers, challenges, conflicts, and facilitators in environmental decision‐making: a case of An’Yang Stream restoration. River Research and Applications 34(5): 472–480.

      102 Hong, C.Y., Chang, H., and Chung, E.S. (2019). Comparing the functional recognition of aesthetics, hydrology, and quality in urban stream restoration through the framework of environmental perception. River Research and Applications 35(6): 543–552.

      103 Hull, R.B. and Robertson, D.P. (2000). Which nature? In: Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eds P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull), 299–307. Washington DC: Island Press.

      104 IPBES (Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) (2020). Ecosystem services: glossary. https://ipbes.net/glossary/ecosystem‐services (accessed 8 December 2020).

      105 Jähnig, S.C., Lorenz, A.W., Hering, D., et al. (2011). River restoration success: a question of perception. Ecological Applications 21(6): 2007–2015.

      106 Januchowski‐Hartley, S.R., Moon, K., Stoeckl, N., et al. (2012). Social factors and private benefits influence landholders’ riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia. Journal of Environmental Management 110: 20–26.

      107 Jia, H., Dong, N., and Ma, H. (2010). Evaluation of aquatic rehabilitation technologies for polluted urban rivers and the case study of the Foshan Channel. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China 4(2): 213–220.

      108 Jordan, W.R., III (2000). Restoration, community, and wilderness. In: Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities (eds P.H. Gobster and R.B. Hull), 23–36. Washington DC: Island Press.

      109 Junker, B. and Buchecker, M. (2008). Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape and Urban Planning 85(3–4): 141–154.

      110 Junker, B., Buchecker, M., and Müller‐Böker, U. (2007). Objectives of public participation: which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Water Resources Research 43(10). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005584.

      111 Kail, J., Hering, D., Muhar, S., et al. (2007). The use of large wood in stream restoration: experiences from 50 projects in Germany and Austria. Journal of Applied Ecology 44(6): 1145–1155.

      112 Kaiser, F.G., Wölfing, S., and Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19(1): 1–19.

      113 Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect, and cognition: environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior 19(1): 3–32.

      114 Kendy, E., Aylward, B., Ziemer, L.S., et al. (2018). Water transactions for streamflow restoration, water supply reliability, and rural economic vitality in the western United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 54(2): 487–504.

      115 Kenney, M.A., Wilcock, P.R., Hobbs, B.F., et al. (2012). Is urban stream restoration worth it? Journal of the American Water Resources Association 48(3): 603–615.

      116 Kern,