River Restoration. Группа авторов

Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

      28 Blanc, G., Demeulenaere, E., and Feuerhahn, W. (2017). Humanités environnementales. Enquêtes et contre‐enquêtes. Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne.

      29 Bliem, M., Getzner, M., and Rodiga‐Laßnig, P. (2012). Temporal stability of individual preferences for river restoration in Austria using a choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management 103: 65–73.

      30 Boon, P.J., Calow, P., and Petts, G.E. (eds) (1992). River Conservation and Management. Chichester: Wiley.

      31 Boxall, P.C., Adamowicz, W.L., Swait, J., et al. (1996). A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation. Ecological Economics 18(3): 243–253.

      32 Bradshaw, A.D. (2002). Introduction and philosophy. In: Handbook of Ecological Restoration. Principles of Restoration (eds M.R. Perrow and A.J. Davy), 3–9. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

      33 Brooks, S.S. and Lake, P.S. (2007). River restoration in Victoria, Australia: change is in the wind, and none too soon. Restoration Ecology 15(3): 584–591.

      34 Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., et al. (2016). Valuation and transferability of the non‐market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering 87: 20–29.

      35 Brouwer, R. and Sheremet, O. (2017). The economic value of river restoration. Water Resources and Economics 17: 1–8.

      36 Buijs, A.E. (2009). Public support for river restoration: a mixed‐method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. Journal of Environmental Management 90(8): 2680–2689.

      37 Cairns Jr, J. (1995). Ecosocietal restoration reestablishing humanity’s relationship with natural systems. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 37(5): 4–33.

      38 Carah, J.K., Blencowe, C.C., Wright, D.W., et al. (2014). Low‐cost restoration techniques for rapidly increasing wood cover in coastal coho salmon streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 34(5): 1003–1013.

      39 Cardinale, B.J., Duffy, J.E., Gonzalez, A., et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67.

      40 Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D., et al. (eds) (2016). A Companion to Environmental Geography. Chichester: Wiley.

      41 Che, Y., Yang, K., Chen, T., et al. (2012). Assessing a riverfront rehabilitation project using the comprehensive index of public accessibility. Ecological Engineering 40: 80–87.

      42 Chen, W.Y. (2017). Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: a hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning 157: 170–179.

      43 Chen, W.Y. and Cho, F.H.T. (2019). Environmental information disclosure and societal preferences for urban river restoration: latent class modelling of a discrete‐choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production 231: 1294–1306.

      44 Chen, W.Y., Liekens, I., and Broekx, S. (2017). Identifying societal preferences for river restoration in a densely populated urban environment: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in central Brussels. Environmental Management 60(2): 263–279.

      45 Chen, X., Wang, D., Tian, F., et al. (2016). From channelization to restoration: sociohydrologic modeling with changing community preferences in the Kissimmee River Basin, Florida. Water Resources Research 52(2): 1227–1244.

      46 Cheng, B., Li, H., Yue, S., et al. (2019). Compensation for agricultural economic losses caused by restoration of healthy eco‐hydrological sequences of rivers. Water 11(6): 1155.

      47 Chin, A., Daniels, M.D., Urban, M.A., et al. (2008). Perceptions of wood in rivers and challenges for stream restoration in the United States. Environmental Management 41(6): 893–903.

      48 Choi, Y.D. (2007). Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15(2): 351–353.

      49 Chou, R.J. (2016). Achieving successful river restoration in dense urban areas: lessons from Taiwan. Sustainability 8(11): 1159.

      50 Clewell, A.F. and Aronson, J. (2006). Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20(2): 420–428.

      51 Clewell, A.F. and Aronson, J. (2013). Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. Washington DC: Island Press.

      52 Connelly, N.A., Knuth, B.A., and Kay, D.L. (2002). Public support for ecosystem restoration in the Hudson River Valley, USA. Environmental Management 29(4): 467–476.

      53 Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387(6630): 253–260.

      54 Crutzen P.J., Stoermer E.F. (2000). The “Anthropocene.” IGPB Newsletter 41: 17–18.

      55 Daily, G.C. (1997). Nature’s Services: Volume 3. Washington DC: Island Press.

      56 Davenport, M.A., Bridges, C.A., Mangun, J.C., et al. (2010). Building local community commitment to wetlands restoration: a case study of the Cache River wetlands in southern Illinois, USA. Environmental Management 45(4): 711–722.

      57 Davis, M.A. and Slobodkin, L.B. (2004). The science and values of restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology 12(1): 1–3.

      58 Deffner, J. and Haase, P. (2018). The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society 23(4): 35.

      59 Depraz, S. (2005). Le concept d’«Akzeptanz» et son utilité en géographie sociale. L’Espace Géographique 34(1): 1–16.

      60 Downs, P.W. and Kondolf, G.M. (2002). Post‐project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29(4): 477–496.

      61 Downs, P.W. and Thorne, C.R. (2000). Rehabilitation of a lowland river: reconciling flood defence with habitat diversity and geomorphological sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management 58(4): 249–268.

      62 Doyle, M.W., Singh, J., Lave, R., et al. (2015). The morphology of streams restored for market and nonmarket purposes: insights from a mixed natural‐social science approach. Water Resources Research 51(7): 5603–5622.

      63 Drouineau, H., Carter, C., Rambonilaza, M., et al. (2018). River continuity restoration and diadromous fishes: much more than an ecological issue. Environmental Management 61(4): 671–686.

      64 Druschke, C.G., Lundberg, E., Drapier, L., et al. (2017). Centring fish agency in coastal dam removal and river restoration. Water Alternatives 10(3): 724–743.

      65 Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., et al. (2005). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163–182.

      66 Dufour, S. and Piégay, H. (2009). From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications 25(5): 568–581.

      67 Dunlap, R.E., Buttel, F.H., Dickens, P., et al. (eds) (2002). Sociological Theory and the Environment: Classical Foundations, Contemporary Insights. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

      68 Eden, S. and Tunstall, S. (2006). Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science–policy nexus in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24(5): 661–680.

      69 Eden, S., Tunstall, S., and Tapsell, S. (2000). Translating nature: river restoration as nature‐culture. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 257–273.

      70 Edwards, P.M., Shaloum, G., and Bedell, D. (2018). A unique role for citizen science in ecological restoration: a case study in streams. Restoration Ecology 26(1): 29–35.

      71 Elliot, R. (1982). Faking nature. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25(1): 81–93.

      72 Emmett, R.S. and Nye, D.E. (2017). The Environmental Humanities: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

      73 Feng, Q., Miao, Z., Li, Z., et al. (2015). Public perception